19 C.F.R. §351.309 - Written argument
| Cite as | 19 C.F.R. §351.309 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
154 cases
-
Coal. For Fair Trade In Hardwood Plywood v. United States, 20-03930
...specifically require that a party raise all arguments in a timely manner before the agency. Corus Staal, 502 F.3d at 1379 (citing 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2)). And "general policies underlying the exhaustion requirement-protecting administrative agency authority and promoting judicial efficie......
-
Jacobi Carbons AB v. United States, Slip Op. 17–39
...issue in its case brief, to which Jacobi responded in rebuttal. Pet'rs' Rev. Case Br. at 13–15; Jacobi Rebuttal Br. at 9–16; see also 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(d)(2) ("The rebuttal brief may respond only to arguments raised in case briefs and should identify the arguments to which it is respondin......
-
Zhejiang Mach. Import & Export Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 20-122
...states that the "Court of International Trade shall, where appropriate, require the exhaustion of administrative remedies." See also 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Respondents can meet this requirement with a "presentation of all issues and arguments in a party's administrative case brief" to C......
-
Jtekt Corporation v. U.S., Slip Op. 09-147.
...it first proposed the use of additional physical characteristics in its case brief.6 NPB Mem. 25. Instead, NPB Page 1223 relies on 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2), which requires a party to submit all of its arguments in its case brief, including arguments presented before the publication of the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
April 2020 Trade Law Update
...ordered Commerce to consider South Vina’s substanve arguments on remand, as South Vina was found to have acted in accordance with 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Because the court could not yet consider the rate applied to separate rate respondents on remand, the court could not reach the issue......