19 CFR 351.309 - Written argument

Cite as19 CFR 351.309
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2292 practice notes
  • Jtekt Corporation v. U.S., Slip Op. 09-147.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • 18 Diciembre 2009
    ...it first proposed the use of additional physical characteristics in its case brief.6 NPB Mem. 25. Instead, NPB Page 1223 relies on 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2), which requires a party to submit all of its arguments in its case brief, including arguments presented before the publication of the ......
  • Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. U.S., No. 06-1044.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • 14 Diciembre 2006
    ...relating to the countervailable subsidy determination, including submission of written arguments. See 19 C.F.R. §§ 351.221, 351.301, 351.309. In this respect, during its annual review, Commerce typically restricts its consideration to entries made during the one year period of review (or "P......
  • Tri Union Frozen Prods., Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 16–33
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • 6 Abril 2016
    ...factual information in making its arguments, even if it claims that the information is generally known or not in serious dispute. See 19 C.F.R. 351.309(c). If MPG wished to rely on academic studies, textbooks, and website information referencing statistical analysis in making its arguments ......
  • Zhejiang Mach. Import & Export Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 20-122
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • 21 Agosto 2020
    ...states that the "Court of International Trade shall, where appropriate, require the exhaustion of administrative remedies." See also 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Respondents can meet this requirement with a "presentation of all issues and arguments in a party's administrative case brief" to C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
140 cases
  • Jtekt Corporation v. U.S., Slip Op. 09-147.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • 18 Diciembre 2009
    ...it first proposed the use of additional physical characteristics in its case brief.6 NPB Mem. 25. Instead, NPB Page 1223 relies on 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2), which requires a party to submit all of its arguments in its case brief, including arguments presented before the publication of the ......
  • Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. U.S., No. 06-1044.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • 14 Diciembre 2006
    ...relating to the countervailable subsidy determination, including submission of written arguments. See 19 C.F.R. §§ 351.221, 351.301, 351.309. In this respect, during its annual review, Commerce typically restricts its consideration to entries made during the one year period of review (or "P......
  • Tri Union Frozen Prods., Inc. v. United States, Slip Op. 16–33
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • 6 Abril 2016
    ...factual information in making its arguments, even if it claims that the information is generally known or not in serious dispute. See 19 C.F.R. 351.309(c). If MPG wished to rely on academic studies, textbooks, and website information referencing statistical analysis in making its arguments ......
  • Zhejiang Mach. Import & Export Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 20-122
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • 21 Agosto 2020
    ...states that the "Court of International Trade shall, where appropriate, require the exhaustion of administrative remedies." See also 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Respondents can meet this requirement with a "presentation of all issues and arguments in a party's administrative case brief" to C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • April 2020 Trade Law Update
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 4 Mayo 2020
    ...ordered Commerce to consider South Vina’s substanve arguments on remand, as South Vina was found to have acted in accordance with 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Because the court could not yet consider the rate applied to separate rate respondents on remand, the court could not reach the issue......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT