19 C.F.R. §351.309 - Written argument

Cite as19 C.F.R. §351.309
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
154 cases
  • Coal. For Fair Trade In Hardwood Plywood v. United States, 20-03930
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • December 22, 2022
    ...specifically require that a party raise all arguments in a timely manner before the agency. Corus Staal, 502 F.3d at 1379 (citing 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2)). And "general policies underlying the exhaustion requirement-protecting administrative agency authority and promoting judicial efficie......
  • Jacobi Carbons AB v. United States, Slip Op. 17–39
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • April 7, 2017
    ...issue in its case brief, to which Jacobi responded in rebuttal. Pet'rs' Rev. Case Br. at 13–15; Jacobi Rebuttal Br. at 9–16; see also 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(d)(2) ("The rebuttal brief may respond only to arguments raised in case briefs and should identify the arguments to which it is respondin......
  • Zhejiang Mach. Import & Export Corp. v. United States, Slip Op. 20-122
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • August 21, 2020
    ...states that the "Court of International Trade shall, where appropriate, require the exhaustion of administrative remedies." See also 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Respondents can meet this requirement with a "presentation of all issues and arguments in a party's administrative case brief" to C......
  • Jtekt Corporation v. U.S., Slip Op. 09-147.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of International Trade
    • December 18, 2009
    ...it first proposed the use of additional physical characteristics in its case brief.6 NPB Mem. 25. Instead, NPB Page 1223 relies on 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2), which requires a party to submit all of its arguments in its case brief, including arguments presented before the publication of the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • April 2020 Trade Law Update
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • May 4, 2020
    ...ordered Commerce to consider South Vina’s substanve arguments on remand, as South Vina was found to have acted in accordance with 19 C.F.R. § 351.309(c)(2). Because the court could not yet consider the rate applied to separate rate respondents on remand, the court could not reach the issue......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT