20 C.F.R. §404.1566 - Work which exists in the national economy

Cite as20 C.F.R. §404.1566
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 books & journal articles
  • Issue Topics
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Social Security Disability Collection - James' Best Materials. Volume 2
    • May 5, 2015
    ...in significant numbers either in the region where such individual lives or in several regions of the country.” APPLICABLE REGULATIONS 20 C.F.R. §§404.1566, 416.966 Addressing work existing “in the national economy[,]” the regulations explain that such work exists when is present “in signifi......
  • Case survey
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Bohr's Social Security Issues Annotated - Volume I
    • May 4, 2015
    ...generally required by employers throughout the national economy. Davis v. Apfel , 149 F. Supp.2d 99, 108, 109 (D. Del. 2001), citing 20 C.F.R. § 404.1566(d). d. Sixth Circuit (1) Step four of the evaluation requires a determination of the relationship between a claimant’s past relevant work......
  • Attacking Vocational Expert Testimony
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Social Security Disability Advocate's Handbook Content
    • May 4, 2020
    ...decisions, it is, in fact, the number of jobs in the “national economy” which is to form the basis for an other work finding, 20 C.F.R. sec. 404.1566. AR 387-88. Opinion and Order, Coppernoll v. Astrue, 10-cv-535, at 10 (W.D. Wis. May 13, 2011) (copy in appendix). ATTACKING TESTIMONY VOCATI......
  • SSR 96-8p: Assessing Residual Functional Capacity in Initial Claims
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Social Security Disability Advocate's Handbook Content
    • May 4, 2020
    ...Fourth Circuit should be cognizant of the fact that in Smith v. Bowen , 837 F.2d 635 (4th Cir. 1987), the Fourth Circuit construed 20 C.F.R. §§404.1566(e) and 416.966(e) as precluding the use of vocational experts at step four of the sequential evaluation. The Agency acquiesced to Smith in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT