7 CFR 900.1 - Words in the singular form
Cite as | 7 CFR 900.1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 practice notes
-
Select Milk Producers, Inc. v. Veneman, No. CIV.A. 01-60(RCL).
...for a hearing upon a proposed order." 7 U.S.C. § 608c(3) (2003). The Secretary has established regulations for holding these hearings. 7 C.F.R. §§ 900.1-900.18 (2004). The regulations require that first a "Notice of Hearing" be issued that "shall define the scope of the hearings as specific......
-
White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Conner, No. 07-3545.
...plaintiffs alleged violations of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.; the USDA's rules of practice, 7 C.F.R. § 900.1 et seq.; the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.; the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.; and the Fifth ......
-
Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Butz, No. C-74-1976 WHO.
...has established administrative procedures under which amendments to marketing orders may be proposed and prosecuted. 7 C.F.R. § 993.93; 7 C.F.R. §§ 900.1-900.18. Plaintiffs do not seek to amend the Order or to propose a new one; rather, they contend that defendants' interpretation of that O......
-
White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Johanns, Case No. 3:05-CV-0620-AS.
...a recommended decision by the Administrator, opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments, and a final decision by the Secretary. 7 C.F.R. §§ 900.1-13. The final decision becomes effective only after two-thirds of the affected producers consent to its adoption as a rule through a refer......
4 cases
-
Select Milk Producers, Inc. v. Veneman, No. CIV.A. 01-60(RCL).
...for a hearing upon a proposed order." 7 U.S.C. § 608c(3) (2003). The Secretary has established regulations for holding these hearings. 7 C.F.R. §§ 900.1-900.18 (2004). The regulations require that first a "Notice of Hearing" be issued that "shall define the scope of the hearings as specific......
-
White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Conner, No. 07-3545.
...plaintiffs alleged violations of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.; the USDA's rules of practice, 7 C.F.R. § 900.1 et seq.; the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq.; the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq.; and the Fifth ......
-
Prune Bargaining Ass'n v. Butz, No. C-74-1976 WHO.
...has established administrative procedures under which amendments to marketing orders may be proposed and prosecuted. 7 C.F.R. § 993.93; 7 C.F.R. §§ 900.1-900.18. Plaintiffs do not seek to amend the Order or to propose a new one; rather, they contend that defendants' interpretation of that O......
-
White Eagle Co-Op. Ass'n v. Johanns, Case No. 3:05-CV-0620-AS.
...a recommended decision by the Administrator, opportunity to comment on the proposed amendments, and a final decision by the Secretary. 7 C.F.R. §§ 900.1-13. The final decision becomes effective only after two-thirds of the affected producers consent to its adoption as a rule through a refer......