11 CFR 111.36 - Who will review the respondent's written response?
| Cite as | 11 CFR 111.36 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
McChesney v. Peterson, 8:16CV168
...filed responses challenging the Commission's reason-to-believe finding are reviewed by a Commission "Reviewing Officer." 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(a). The Reviewing Officer submits a written recommendation to the Commission, that is also provided to the respondent. 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(e), (f). The ......
-
McChesney v. Petersen, 8:16CV168
...filed responses challenging the Commission's reason-to-believe finding are reviewed by a Commission "Reviewing Officer." 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(a). The Reviewing Officer submits a written recommendation to the Commission, that is also provided to the respondent. 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(e), (f). The ......
-
Compliance procedures:
Administrative fines challenges; best efforts,
...revised 11 CFR 111.35. The Commission's reviewing officer considers the challenge and forwards a recommendation to the Commission. See 11 CFR 111.36(e). After considering the challenge, the reviewing officer's recommendation, and any subsequent comments from the respondent regarding the rec......
-
Administrative fines: Reporting requirements; civil money penalties,
...with their written response. Reviewing Officer The respondent's written response would be forwarded to a reviewing officer under proposed 11 CFR 111.36. To ensure impartiality, the reviewing officer would not be someone who was involved in developing the reason to believe finding. The revie......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
-
McChesney v. Peterson, 8:16CV168
...filed responses challenging the Commission's reason-to-believe finding are reviewed by a Commission "Reviewing Officer." 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(a). The Reviewing Officer submits a written recommendation to the Commission, that is also provided to the respondent. 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(e), (f). The ......
-
McChesney v. Petersen, 8:16CV168
...filed responses challenging the Commission's reason-to-believe finding are reviewed by a Commission "Reviewing Officer." 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(a). The Reviewing Officer submits a written recommendation to the Commission, that is also provided to the respondent. 11 C.F.R. § 111.36(e), (f). The ......