11 CFR 109.1 - When will this part apply?
| Cite as | 11 CFR 109.1 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
Federal Election Commission,
...approach would depart from the approach taken regarding the definition of agency in the current independent expenditure rules. See 11 CFR 109.1(b)(5). B. Definition of ``Directly or Indirectly Establish, Finance, Maintain, or Proposed 11 CFR 300.2(c) would define ``directly or indirectly es......
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part II
Federal Election Commission,
...communication'' from section 109.21 and a ``party coordinated communication'' from 11 CFR 109.37. The Commission is also moving pre-BCRA 11 CFR 109.1(e), which clarifies the basic definition of ``independent expenditure,'' to paragraph (b) of section 100.16, without other changes. This rule......
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part II
Federal Election Commission,
...Paragraph (f) of 11 CFR 104.4 addresses aggregation of independent expenditures for reporting purposes. The provisions of pre-BCRA 11 CFR 109.1(f) are being moved to this section and revised to explain when and how political committees and other persons making independent expenditures must ......
-
Federal Election Commission,
...committee on behalf of that candidate would never qualify as an independent expenditure. This rule, which is found at pre-BCRA 11 CFR 109.1(e), clarifies the basic definition of “independent expenditure.” Proposed Reorganization of 11 CFR Part 109 The Commission proposes to reorganize 11 CF......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, No. 02–582 CKK,KLH,RJL
...or who is, or has been, receiving any form of compensation or reimbursement from the candidate, the candidate's committee or agent." 11 C.F.R. § 109.1(b)(4)(i)(B) (1999 ed.) (repealed 2001) (emphasis added).96 Plaintiffs' argument that Buckley should be construed as rejecting the opportunit......
-
Shays v. F.E.C., No. CIV.A. 02-1984(CKK).
...where it would reasonably appear that in the ordinary course of campaign-related activities he or she may authorize expenditures. 11 C.F.R. § 109.1(b)(5) (2001). They argue that given this background, it is clear that "Congress crafted new statutory provisions using `a well established term......
-
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission, No. 02-582 CKK,KLH,RJL
...or who is, or has been, receiving any form of compensation or reimbursement from the candidate, the candidate's committee or agent." 11 C.F.R. § 109.1(b)(4)(i)(B) (1999 ed.) (repealed 2001) (emphasis 96 Plaintiffs' argument that Buckley should be construed as rejecting the opportunity for A......
-
Federal Election Com'n v. Christian Coalition, No. CIV. A. 96-1781(JHG).
...or who is, or has been, receiving any form of compensation or reimbursement from the candidate, the candidate's committee or agent. 11 C.F.R. § 109.1(b)(4). An expenditure not qualifying under this section as an independent expenditure shall be a contribution in-kind to the candidate and an......
Request a trial to view additional results