24 C.F.R. 1000.318 - When do units under Formula Current Assisted Stock cease to be counted or expire from the inventory used for the formula?
| Cite as | 24 C.F.R. 1000.318 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
31 practice notes
-
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, No. 08-848C
...Urban Dev., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1125, 1130 (D. Colo. 2006) (Fort Peck I). In particular, the report criticized HUD for failing to enforce 24 C.F.R. § 1000.318, a regulation specifying that housing units would no longer be considered FCAS "when the Indian tribe . . . no longer has the legal righ......
-
Walker River Paiute Tribe v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., No. 3:08–CV–0627–LRH–VPC.
...in 1998 which allows for a downward adjustment to each tribe's FCAS calculation once a unit has been conveyed to an Indian family. See 24 C.F.R. § 1000.318.5 68 F.Supp.3d 1207Section 1000.318 specifically provides that a dwelling unit ceases to be counted for a tribe's FCAS calculation once......
-
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, No. 08-848C
...Urban Dev., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1125, 1130 (D. Colo. 2006) (Fort Peck I). In particular, the report criticized HUD for failing to enforce 24 C.F.R. § 1000.318, a regulation specifying that housing units would no longer be considered FCAS "when the Indian tribe . . . no longer has the legal righ......
-
San Antonio Hous. Auth. v. United States, No. 17-1796C
...when those units no longer qualify (e.g., when they have been or could have been conveyed to homebuyers). 24 C.F.R. §§ 1000.312, 1000.314, 1000.318. Once awarded these subsidies, grantee tribes are limited in how and when they may dispense the funds, which can be used only on statutorily sp......
Request a trial to view additional results
31 cases
-
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, No. 08-848C
...Urban Dev., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1125, 1130 (D. Colo. 2006) (Fort Peck I). In particular, the report criticized HUD for failing to enforce 24 C.F.R. § 1000.318, a regulation specifying that housing units would no longer be considered FCAS "when the Indian tribe . . . no longer has the legal righ......
-
Walker River Paiute Tribe v. U.S. Dep't of Hous. & Urban Dev., No. 3:08–CV–0627–LRH–VPC.
...in 1998 which allows for a downward adjustment to each tribe's FCAS calculation once a unit has been conveyed to an Indian family. See 24 C.F.R. § 1000.318.5 68 F.Supp.3d 1207Section 1000.318 specifically provides that a dwelling unit ceases to be counted for a tribe's FCAS calculation once......
-
Lummi Tribe of the Lummi Reservation v. United States, No. 08-848C
...Urban Dev., 435 F. Supp. 2d 1125, 1130 (D. Colo. 2006) (Fort Peck I). In particular, the report criticized HUD for failing to enforce 24 C.F.R. § 1000.318, a regulation specifying that housing units would no longer be considered FCAS "when the Indian tribe . . . no longer has the legal righ......
-
San Antonio Hous. Auth. v. United States, No. 17-1796C
...when those units no longer qualify (e.g., when they have been or could have been conveyed to homebuyers). 24 C.F.R. §§ 1000.312, 1000.314, 1000.318. Once awarded these subsidies, grantee tribes are limited in how and when they may dispense the funds, which can be used only on statutorily sp......
Request a trial to view additional results