What is the maximum civil penalty?
| Currency | Current through May 31, 2023 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 cases
-
Pauley Petroleum Inc. v. United States, 197-69.
...the Interior Department. Early in May (after this suit had been brought) the Department announced a set of proposed amendments to 30 C.F.R. part 250, including the disputed section 250.42. 34 Fed.Reg. 7381, 7383 (1969). On August 22, 1969, after considering various comments submitted pursua......
-
Century Exploration New Orleans, LLC v. United States, 11-54 C
...MMS Notices to Lessees, which interpret requirements in the above-mentioned implementing regulations," which the stipulation defines as 30 C.F.R. Part 250.23 Def.'s Ex. 1 at A5. Accordingly, there is no question that the lease contemplated the government's issuance of NTLs, and requires pla......
-
California ex rel. California Coastal v. Norton, C 99-4964 CW.
...leases for exploration for and production of oil and gas on the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). See 43 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq.; see also 30 C.F.R. part 250 et seq. (regulations implementing the OSCLA). These leases may have a primary term of five to ten years, and may continue after the primar......
-
Taylor Energy Co. v. United States, 2019-1983
...OCSLA decommissioning regulations in two areas. First, Schedule A states that Taylor's work "will conform to MMS regulations contained in 30 CFR 250 Subpart Q ... and Subpart C." J.A. 97. Second, the Trust incorporates the terms of the MC-20 leases, which each expressly incorporate OCSLA re......
Request a trial to view additional results
13 firm's commentaries
-
OSHA, EPA and DOI Increase Maximum Civil Penalties
...August 30, 2016. The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement increased the maximum daily civil penalty for each violation under 30 C.F.R. Part 250 from $40,000 to $42,017.[9] The increased penalties are effective July 28, 2016, and a comment period is open until August 29, The Office......
-
Fifth Circuit to Hold Oral Argument in Sojitz v. UNOCAL in April 2020
...costs, Sojitz cannot do so in BSEE’s name through equitable subrogation.” UNOCAL also cites to OCSLA and BSEE’s regulations at 30 C.F.R. § 250, Subpart N, as support for the notion that “BSEE’s primary enforcement mechanisms for violations of the decommissioning regulations are civil fines ......
-
Fifth Circuit to Hold Oral Argument in Sojitz v. UNOCAL in April 2020
...costs, Sojitz cannot do so in BSEE’s name through equitable subrogation.” UNOCAL also cites to OCSLA and BSEE’s regulations at 30 C.F.R. § 250, Subpart N, as support for the notion that “BSEE’s primary enforcement mechanisms for violations of the decommissioning regulations are civil fines ......
-
“Constituents Of Chaos” – Administrative Appellate Decision Confirms Bureau Of Safety And Environmental Enforcement Jurisdiction Over Offshore Contractors
...“a lessee, the owner or holder of operating rights, [or] a designated operator or agent of the lessee(s),” (the group defined as “You” in 30 C.F.R. 250, and to which the regulatory provisions of the general safety rule of 30 C.F.R. §207 expressly and limitedly apply) are subject to regulati......
Request a trial to view additional results