11 CFR 109.21 - What is a ''coordinated communication''?

Cite as11 CFR 109.21
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
53 practice notes
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 08, 2003
    • August 8, 2003
    ...such would have to be so reported through the amendment process. Please note that nothing in these final rules alters the application of 11 CFR 109.21(b)(2) or 109.37(a)(3) or (b). The Commission also notes that these final rules in no way address situations where the Commission determines ......
  • Separate Parts In This Issue Part II Federal Election Commission,
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 03, 2003
    • January 3, 2003
    ...new regulations on ``coordinated communications'' in their place. Public Law 107-155, sec. 214(b), (c) (March 27, 2002). A new section 11 CFR 109.21 implements this Congressional In addition, the new and revised rules implement several new restrictions found in BCRA on the timing of indepen......
  • Independent Expenditures and Electioneering Communications by Corporations and Labor Organizations
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 21, 2014
    • October 21, 2014
    ...\8\ The Commission's coordination regulations distinguish between communications (e.g., advertisements, mass mailings, phone banks), 11 CFR 109.21, and ``non-communication'' expenditures (e.g., rent or computers), 11 CFR 109.20(b). See Coordinated and Independent Expenditures, 68 FR 425-26 ......
  • Part III
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 11, 2004
    • March 11, 2004
    ...to meet both the definition of ``independent expenditure'' in 2 U.S.C. 431(17) and the definition of ``coordinated communication'' under 11 CFR 109.21? Is the function of the definition of ``independent expenditure'' in 2 U.S.C. 431(17)(A) limited to the 24-hour and 48-hour reporting requir......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
22 cases
  • Shays v. Federal Election Com'n, No. 04-5352.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 15, 2005
    ...ads more than 120 days before the election; according to Shays and Meehan, BCRA restricts such spending. See infra at 97-98 (discussing 11 C.F.R. § 109.21). Likewise, rival state parties may spend soft money to pay employees devoting a quarter of their time to defeating Shays and Meehan; th......
  • McConnell v. Fed. Election Comm'n, No. 02–582 CKK,KLH,RJL
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • May 1, 2003
    ...or policy issues." Final Rules; Coordinated and Independent Expenditures, 68 Fed.Reg. at 455 (Jan. 3, 2003) (to be codified at 11 C.F.R. § 109.21(f) ). To decide Plaintiffs' claims at this juncture would entangle the Court in a dispute that has not been "presented in a clean-cut and concret......
  • Shays v. U.S. Federal Election Com'n, Civil Action No. 06-1247 (CKK).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 12, 2007
    ...Judgment. Summary of Conclusions The Court concludes that the revised coordinated communications content standard contained in 11 C.F.R. § 109.21(c)(4) survives Chevron analysis, but does not meet the Administrative Procedure Act's ("APA") requirement of reasoned Page 19 See infra at 37-49.......
  • Campaign Legal Ctr. v. Fed. Election Comm'n, Civil Action No. 19-2336 (JEB)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • June 4, 2020
    ...with the candidate/party satisfies specified ‘conduct standards.’ " Shays v. FEC, 414 F.3d 76, 98 (D.C. Cir. 2005) (quoting 11 C.F.R. § 109.21(a) ). The "content standards" referred to in subsection (2) of the regulation require the communication to be a "public" one. See 11 C.F.R. § 109.21......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
  • A Guide to Political and Lobbying Activities - Updated: February 2012
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • February 14, 2012
    ...discussions with the candidate or party; (4) made by an entity with a “common vendor” to produce or distribute the communication (11 C.F.R. 109.21(d)(4)); or (5) made or informed by an entity who had previously been an employee or independent contractor of a campaign or party committee, wit......
  • A Guide to Political and Lobbying Activities
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • January 31, 2019
    ...discussions with the candidate or party; (4) made by an entity with a “common vendor” to produce or distribute the communication (11 C.F.R. 109.21(d)(4)); or POLITICAL FUNDRAISING Page I-37 Copyright © 2019 K&L Gates (5) made or informed by an entity who had previously been an employee ......
  • Super-PACs And Elections: Separating Myth From Reality
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • March 12, 2012
    ...PAC." Jack Coyle, Colbert's Rolling Super PAC Donations, Wash. Post, Feb. 1, 2012, at C5. 21 See generally 2 U.S.C. § 437(g). 22 11 C.F.R. §§ 109.21(d)(4) & 23 Id. § 109.21(h). The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advi......
  • Vote For This And We Will Support You! How The New Definition of Coordinated Communications Affects Political Speech in The Wake of Citizens United
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • October 12, 2010
    ...communication, and (ii) whether the federal candidate, campaign committee, or political party either initiated it or consented to it. 11 C.F.R. § 109.21. One element of the content test and a separate element of the conduct test must be met for a communication to be considered Content Test ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Voters Need to Know: Assessing the Legality of Redboxing in Federal Elections.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 130 Nbr. 7, May 2021
    • May 1, 2021
    ...(141). Id. ("The new safe harbor [for publicly available information] does not apply to the 'request or suggestion' conduct standard in 11 C.F.R. 109.21 (d) (1)." (emphasis (142). Id. (143). See supra Section LA (discussing the origins of the practice). (144). See, e.g., FEC MUR 6908 (Natio......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT