36 CFR 51.17 - What are the selection factors?
| Cite as | 36 CFR 51.17 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 practice notes
-
Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, CIV.A. 00-2838.
...Indians, Indian tribes, Native Alaskans, or minority or women-owned businesses in operations under the proposed concession contract. 36 C.F.R. § 51.17(b). The plaintiffs argue that the NPS's regulations are arbitrary and capricious because they "dramatically alter the weights of the selecti......
-
ECO Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United States, 13-532 C
...set forth in the prospectus are consistent with those set forth in the 1998 Act, see 16 U.S.C. § 5952(5), and the regulations, see 36 C.F.R. § 51.17. 8. On August 15, 2013, the government filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on ripeness grounds based on the government's assertion......
-
AMFAC Resorts v. United States Department of the Interior, Civ. A. No. 00-2838 (RCL)
...Indians, Indian tribes, Native Alaskans, or minority or women-owned businesses in operations under the proposed concession contract. 36 C.F.R. § 51.17(b). The plaintiffs argue that the NPS's regulations are arbitrary and capricious because they "dramatically alter the weights of the selecti......
-
Nat'l Mall Tours of Wash., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, Civil Action No. 15-0529 (ABJ)
...minimum franchise fee and other forms of financial consideration to the Service. . . .AR3113;see also 54 U.S.C. § 101913(5)(A); 36 C.F.R. § 51.17(a). The Prospectus also identified a Secondary Selection Factor: "[t]he quality of the Offeror's proposal to conduct its operations in a manner t......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Amfac Resorts, L.L.C. v. U.S. Dept. of Interior, CIV.A. 00-2838.
...Indians, Indian tribes, Native Alaskans, or minority or women-owned businesses in operations under the proposed concession contract. 36 C.F.R. § 51.17(b). The plaintiffs argue that the NPS's regulations are arbitrary and capricious because they "dramatically alter the weights of the selecti......
-
ECO Tour Adventures, Inc. v. United States, 13-532 C
...set forth in the prospectus are consistent with those set forth in the 1998 Act, see 16 U.S.C. § 5952(5), and the regulations, see 36 C.F.R. § 51.17. 8. On August 15, 2013, the government filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on ripeness grounds based on the government's assertion......
-
AMFAC Resorts v. United States Department of the Interior, Civ. A. No. 00-2838 (RCL)
...Indians, Indian tribes, Native Alaskans, or minority or women-owned businesses in operations under the proposed concession contract. 36 C.F.R. § 51.17(b). The plaintiffs argue that the NPS's regulations are arbitrary and capricious because they "dramatically alter the weights of the selecti......
-
Nat'l Mall Tours of Wash., Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Interior, Civil Action No. 15-0529 (ABJ)
...minimum franchise fee and other forms of financial consideration to the Service. . . .AR3113;see also 54 U.S.C. § 101913(5)(A); 36 C.F.R. § 51.17(a). The Prospectus also identified a Secondary Selection Factor: "[t]he quality of the Offeror's proposal to conduct its operations in a manner t......
Request a trial to view additional results