14 CFR 302.206 - Verification

Cite as14 CFR 302.206
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 practice notes
  • Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. C. A. B., No. 76-2131
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • March 30, 1979
    ...filed a Petition for Enforcement, based on Hawaiian's complaint. The petition was filed pursuant to the Board's Procedural Rule 206, 14 C.F.R. § 302.206 (1978), 2 and averred that the complaint gave reasonable grounds to believe that violations of the Act had occurred and formal investigati......
  • Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, No. 16672.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • May 4, 1961
    ...filed by third parties, as distinguished from complaints verified by the enforcement attorney. This is made clear by rule 205 (now 14 C.F.R. § 302.206 (1960 Supp.)) which specifies that the petition for enforcement shall be accompanied by either a complaint submitted under rule 201 or one v......
  • Union of Professional Airmen v. C.A.B., No. 73--1526
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • April 11, 1975
    ...20, 1971 the Bureau docketed a petition for enforcement, thereby instituting an enforcement proceeding against Shawnee Airlines. 14 C.F.R. § 302.206. Shortly before the hearing on UPA's complaint Shawnee filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The ground of the motion was that b......
3 cases
  • Aloha Airlines, Inc. v. C. A. B., No. 76-2131
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • March 30, 1979
    ...filed a Petition for Enforcement, based on Hawaiian's complaint. The petition was filed pursuant to the Board's Procedural Rule 206, 14 C.F.R. § 302.206 (1978), 2 and averred that the complaint gave reasonable grounds to believe that violations of the Act had occurred and formal investigati......
  • Great Lakes Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, No. 16672.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • May 4, 1961
    ...filed by third parties, as distinguished from complaints verified by the enforcement attorney. This is made clear by rule 205 (now 14 C.F.R. § 302.206 (1960 Supp.)) which specifies that the petition for enforcement shall be accompanied by either a complaint submitted under rule 201 or one v......
  • Union of Professional Airmen v. C.A.B., No. 73--1526
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • April 11, 1975
    ...20, 1971 the Bureau docketed a petition for enforcement, thereby instituting an enforcement proceeding against Shawnee Airlines. 14 C.F.R. § 302.206. Shortly before the hearing on UPA's complaint Shawnee filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The ground of the motion was that b......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT