24 C.F.R. §982.517 - Utility allowance schedule

Cite as24 C.F.R. §982.517
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Thompson v. Donovan, 13-CV-2988 (CS)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. Southern District of New York
    • 14 de outubro de 2014
    ...E, at 5.) The tenant's allowance is calculated based on typical utility costs of energy conservative households in the locality. See 24 C.F.R. § 982.517. "If a tenant's utility bill exceeds the allowance, the tenant must make up the difference; if the allowance exceeds the bill, the differe......
  • Johnson v. Housing Authority of Jefferson Parish, 04-31201.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 6 de março de 2006
    ...law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress. 2. United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. § 1437 et seq. (2005). 3. 24 C.F.R. § 982.517 et 4. See Morse v. Republican Party, 517 U.S. 186, 234-35, 116 S.Ct. 1186, 134 L.Ed.2d 347 (1996) (deciding only whether there existed a......
  • Daniels v. Hous. Auth. of Prince George's Cnty., Civil Action No. 11–cv–02938–AW.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • 17 de abril de 2013
    ...in the same locality ... us[ing] normal patterns of consumption for the community as a whole and current utility rates.” Id. (quoting 24 C.F.R. § 982.517(b)(1)). The Johnson court concluded that the tenants could maintain a suit under § 1983 because the tenant-based Section 8 provision was ......
  • Daniels v. Hous. Auth. of Prince George's Cnty., Civil Action No. 11-cv-02938-AW
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. United States District Court (Maryland)
    • 17 de abril de 2013
    ...the same locality . . . us[ing] normal patterns of consumption for the community as a whole and current utility rates." Id. (quoting 24 C.F.R. § 982.517(b)(1)). The Johnson court concluded that the tenants could maintain a suit under § 1983 because the tenant-based Section 8 provision was "......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT