24 C.F.R. §570.307 - Urban counties

Cite as24 C.F.R. §570.307
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Dixson v. United States Hinton v. United States, s. 82-5279
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 22 Febbraio 1984
    ...abide by specific financial accountability, equal opportunity, fair labor, environmental, and other requirements. §§ 5304, 5309, 5310; 24 CFR § 570.307 (1983). By administering HCDA funds, private nonprofit organizations subject themselves to numerous federal restrictions beyond those impos......
  • Latinos Unidos De Chelsea En Accion (Lucha) v. Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, 85-1573
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • 12 Agosto 1986
    ...Development Act must submit their applications to specified local agencies for review. These agencies submit comments to HUD. See 24 C.F.R. Sec. 570.307(c) (April 6 The Housing Assistance Plan (HAP) is a comprehensive planning statement that contains data about the need for lower income hou......
  • White v. Massachusetts Council of Construction Employers, Inc, 81-1003
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • 28 Febbraio 1983
    ...Housing and Community Development Act of 1977, 42 U.S.C. § 5318 (Supp. IV 1980). The HUD regulations governing the program are found at 24 CFR Part 570, Subpart G (1982). CDBGs are administered by HUD pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. § 5301 et seq. (1......
  • Matrix Dev. Grp. v. City of Newark, 2:20-cv-03166 (BRM) (ESK)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • 30 Luglio 2021
    ...for work related to the project “be awarded to eligible business concerns which are located in . . . the area of the project.” 24 C.F.R. § 570.307(m)(1982). Because the order fulfilled these requirements, the Supreme Court found Boston's contracts did not violate the Commerce Clause. Id. at......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT