37 C.F.R. 2.123 - Trial testimony in inter partes cases

Cite as37 C.F.R. 2.123
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
159 practice notes
  • Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos v. Virgin Enterprises, No. 06-1588.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • December 27, 2007
    ...voluntarily for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition under the procedural rules promulgated by the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"), see 37 C.F.R. § 2.123 (2006), the district court issued a subpoena under 35 U.S.C.A. § 24 directing Rosenruist to produce a designee to testify on behalf of the corp......
  • B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., No. 13–352.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 2015
    ...allows parties to submit transcribed testimony, taken under oath and subject to cross-examination, and to request oral argument. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.123, 2.129.135 S.Ct. 1301When a party opposes registration because it believes the mark proposed to be registered is too similar to its own, th......
  • B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., No. 13–352.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 2015
    ...allows parties to submit transcribed testimony, taken under oath and subject to cross-examination, and to request oral argument. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.123, 2.129.135 S.Ct. 1301 When a party opposes registration because it believes the mark proposed to be registered is too similar to its own, t......
  • Kate Spade LLC v. Wolv, Inc., Opposition 91241442
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
    • April 25, 2022
    ...9). [8] Testimony includes an oral deposition, deposition on written questions, a declaration or an affidavit. Trademark Rule 2.123, 37 C.F.R. § 2.123. [9] Notice of Opposition H 6-7 (1 TTABVUE 28). [10] 37-49 TTABVUE. Opposer referred to the exhibits as "unsolicited advertising" presumably......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
155 cases
  • Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos v. Virgin Enterprises, No. 06-1588.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • December 27, 2007
    ...voluntarily for a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition under the procedural rules promulgated by the Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO"), see 37 C.F.R. § 2.123 (2006), the district court issued a subpoena under 35 U.S.C.A. § 24 directing Rosenruist to produce a designee to testify on behalf of the corp......
  • B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., No. 13–352.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 2015
    ...allows parties to submit transcribed testimony, taken under oath and subject to cross-examination, and to request oral argument. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.123, 2.129.135 S.Ct. 1301When a party opposes registration because it believes the mark proposed to be registered is too similar to its own, th......
  • B & B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc., No. 13–352.
    • United States
    • United States Supreme Court
    • March 24, 2015
    ...allows parties to submit transcribed testimony, taken under oath and subject to cross-examination, and to request oral argument. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 2.123, 2.129.135 S.Ct. 1301 When a party opposes registration because it believes the mark proposed to be registered is too similar to its own, t......
  • Kate Spade LLC v. Wolv, Inc., Opposition 91241442
    • United States
    • United States Patent and Trademark Office. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
    • April 25, 2022
    ...9). [8] Testimony includes an oral deposition, deposition on written questions, a declaration or an affidavit. Trademark Rule 2.123, 37 C.F.R. § 2.123. [9] Notice of Opposition H 6-7 (1 TTABVUE 28). [10] 37-49 TTABVUE. Opposer referred to the exhibits as "unsolicited advertising" presumably......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
1 books & journal articles
  • What You Need to Know: Major Changes to the TTAB Rules of Practice
    • United States
    • Landslide Nbr. 9-4, March 2017
    • March 1, 2017
    ...25. Id. 26. Id. 27. Id. 28. Id. § 2.120(i). 29. Id. 30. Id. 31. Id. § 2.123(a)(1). 32. Id. § 2.123(c); 81 Fed. Reg. at 69,964. 33. 37 C.F.R. § 2.123(c). 34. 81 Fed. Reg. at 69964. 35. Id. § 2.123(a)(1). 36. Id. § 2.121(e). 37. Id. § 2.120(k)(3)(ii). 38. Id. § 2.122(g). 39. Id. RULES SUPPLEM......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT