31 CFR 535.201 - Transactions involving property in which Iran or Iranian entities have an interest

Cite as31 CFR 535.201
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
25 practice notes
  • Ministry of Defense and Support v. Cubic Defense, No. 99-56498.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • October 7, 2004
    ...Republic of Iran, 305 F.3d 1249, 1255 (D.C.Cir.2002). Only the IACR are relevant to our analysis of this aspect of the case. Title 31 C.F.R. § 535.201 provides that No property subject to the jurisdiction of the United States or which is in the possession of or control of persons subject to......
  • Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 03 C 9370.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • December 15, 2005
    ...were blocked or frozen pursuant to Executive Order 12170 and its implementing regulations, the Iranian Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 535.201 (which expressly prohibits attachment of blocked funds); (2) the accounts were being maintained in accordance with United States obligations......
  • In re Islamic Republic of Iran Terrorism Lit., Civil Action No. 01-CV-2094.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • September 30, 2009
    ...44 Fed.Reg. 65,729 (Nov. 14, 1979); see Transactions Involving Property in Which Iran or Iranian Entities Have an Interest, Page 50 31 C.F.R. § 535.201; see also Dames & Moore v. Regan, 453 U.S. 654, 662-664, 101 S.Ct. 2972, 69 L.Ed.2d 918 (1981) (discussing the Iran Hostage Crisis and Pres......
  • Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Nos. 00–cv–2329 (RCL), 01–cv–2104 (RCL).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • August 31, 2012
    ...then carve out limited exceptions to that embargo. The first, known as the Iranian Assets Control Regulations (“IACR”) and codified at 31 C.F.R. Part 535, was implemented in 1980 during the Iran Hostage Crisis, 45 Fed.Reg. 24,432 (Apr. 9, 1980), and “broadly prohibits unauthorized transacti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
25 cases
  • Estate of Heiser v. Islamic Republic of Iran, Nos. 00–cv–2329 (RCL), 01–cv–2104 (RCL).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • August 31, 2012
    ...then carve out limited exceptions to that embargo. The first, known as the Iranian Assets Control Regulations (“IACR”) and codified at 31 C.F.R. Part 535, was implemented in 1980 during the Iran Hostage Crisis, 45 Fed.Reg. 24,432 (Apr. 9, 1980), and “broadly prohibits unauthorized transacti......
  • Ministry of Defense and Support v. Cubic Defense, No. 99-56498.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • October 7, 2004
    ...Republic of Iran, 305 F.3d 1249, 1255 (D.C.Cir.2002). Only the IACR are relevant to our analysis of this aspect of the case. Title 31 C.F.R. § 535.201 provides that No property subject to the jurisdiction of the United States or which is in the possession of or control of persons subject to......
  • Ministry Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Def. Sys., Inc., Case No. 98–CV–1165–B (DHB).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Southern District of California)
    • November 27, 2013
    ...any interest of any nature whatsoever may be transferred, paid, exported, or withdrawn or otherwise dealt in except as authorized.” 31 C.F.R. § 535.201 (2013). The freeze took effect on November 14, 1979. On January 19, 1981, the United States settled the hostage crisis and entered the Algi......
  • Rubin v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 03 C 9370.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court (Northern District of Illinois)
    • December 15, 2005
    ...were blocked or frozen pursuant to Executive Order 12170 and its implementing regulations, the Iranian Assets Control Regulations, 31 C.F.R. § 535.201 (which expressly prohibits attachment of blocked funds); (2) the accounts were being maintained in accordance with United States obligations......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT