23 CFR 771.113 - Timing of Administration activities

Cite as23 CFR 771.113
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 practice notes
  • West Ala. Quality of Life v. U.S. Fed. Hwy. Admin., No. CIV.A. H-03-5591.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
    • February 9, 2004
    ...project. Defendants maintain these activities exceed the minimum requirements called for by NEPA. Defendants also refer the Court to 23 C.F.R. § 771.113(a), which states that "final design activities ... shall not proceed until" either the action is classified as a categorical exclusion, a ......
  • Jersey Heights Neighborhood Ass'n v. Glendening, No. 98-1804
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • April 5, 1999
    ...of Alternate 4 as the Bypass corridor the FHWA certified that the SHA had satisfied its responsibilities under NEPA and FAHA. See 23 C.F.R. § 771.113. On the fundamental question of where the highway would be located, the ROD thus signaled the end of the decisionmaking process. At that poin......
  • Burkholder v. Wykle, No. 1:01CV1165.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • February 22, 2002
    ...Federal regulations provide rules for the proper timing of projects such as the one at the bar. Specifically, 40 C.F.R. § 1506.1 and 23 C.F.R. § 771.113 provide, inter (a) Until an agency issues a record of decision ..., no action concerning the proposal shall be taken which would: (1) Have......
  • Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts v. Mirage Resorts, Civil Action No. 97-1371.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 1, 1997
    ...assessment requirements of the Federal-Aid Highway Act ("FHA"), 23 U.S.C. § 109, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 23 C.F.R. Part 771. Plaintiff's fifth count claims that the defendants have not met the requirements of the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7506. All federally funded high......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
17 cases
  • West Ala. Quality of Life v. U.S. Fed. Hwy. Admin., No. CIV.A. H-03-5591.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Southern District of Texas
    • February 9, 2004
    ...project. Defendants maintain these activities exceed the minimum requirements called for by NEPA. Defendants also refer the Court to 23 C.F.R. § 771.113(a), which states that "final design activities ... shall not proceed until" either the action is classified as a categorical exclusion, a ......
  • Jersey Heights Neighborhood Ass'n v. Glendening, No. 98-1804
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • April 5, 1999
    ...of Alternate 4 as the Bypass corridor the FHWA certified that the SHA had satisfied its responsibilities under NEPA and FAHA. See 23 C.F.R. § 771.113. On the fundamental question of where the highway would be located, the ROD thus signaled the end of the decisionmaking process. At that poin......
  • Burkholder v. Wykle, No. 1:01CV1165.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Ohio
    • February 22, 2002
    ...Federal regulations provide rules for the proper timing of projects such as the one at the bar. Specifically, 40 C.F.R. § 1506.1 and 23 C.F.R. § 771.113 provide, inter (a) Until an agency issues a record of decision ..., no action concerning the proposal shall be taken which would: (1) Have......
  • Trump Hotels & Casino Resorts v. Mirage Resorts, Civil Action No. 97-1371.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • May 1, 1997
    ...assessment requirements of the Federal-Aid Highway Act ("FHA"), 23 U.S.C. § 109, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, 23 C.F.R. Part 771. Plaintiff's fifth count claims that the defendants have not met the requirements of the Clean Air Act. 42 U.S.C. § 7506. All federally funded high......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT