5 C.F.R. §551.422 - Time spent traveling

Cite as5 C.F.R. §551.422
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Dooley v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., CIV.A. 01-11029-REK.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. United States District Courts. 1st Circuit. District of Massachusetts
    • February 26, 2004
    ...commutes are exempted from the "integral and indispensable" test would conflict with numerous Department of Labor interpretations. See 5 C.F.R. §§ 551.422(a)(2), 551.401, 550.112(g); see also 29 C.F.R. §§ 785.41, 790.7(d), 790.7(d) n.47; Bobo, 37 Fed. Cl. at 695 n. 7. Instead, I adopt Bobo ......
  • Ketchum v. City of Vallejo, Civ. S-05-1098 RRB JFM.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • October 15, 2007
    ...workday." 29 C.F.R. § 790.6(a). Generally, commuting to and from work is not compensable under the FLSA. Reich, 45 F.3d at 650; see 5 C.F.R. § 551.422(b) ("An employee who travels from home before the regular workday begins and returns home at the end of the workday is engaged in normal `ho......
  • U.S. Dept. of Air Force v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 90-1530
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 26, 1992
    ...concluded that such compensation would be inconsistent with an OPM regulation that sets out compensable "hours of work." See 5 C.F.R. § 551.422(b). Clearly, in both cases the Authority construed Part 551 to be a ceiling not merely a floor upon compensable 6 Our dissenting colleague argues t......
  • Dept. of Treasury-I.R.S. v. F.L.R.A., 05-76031.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 3, 2008
    ...award with the FLRA. Before the FLRA, the IRS raised several arguments: (1) the arbitrator's award was contrary to law because 5 C.F.R. § 551.422(b)1 prohibited federal employees from being compensated for commute time; (2) Article 29, Section 3E of the CBA fell short of being the type of "......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT