36 C.F.R. 219.11 - Timber requirements based on the NFMA

Cite as36 C.F.R. 219.11
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
54 practice notes
  • Sierra Club v. Glickman, No. 9:85-CV-69.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • 14 Agosto 1997
    ...Page 935 requirements that will provide a basis for a periodic determination and evaluation of the effects of management practices." 36 C.F.R. § 219.11(d). In conducting inventorying and monitoring, the Forest Service is required to continually identify research Research needs for managemen......
  • Guardians v. United States Forest Serv., No. 06–2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 21 Abril 2011
    ...new rules prescribe that the USFS “must take into account the best available science.” 70 Fed.Reg. 1023, 1027 (Jan. 5, 2005); see 36 C.F.R. §§ 219.11 (2008). As thoroughly explained by the district court, Forest Guardians had argued to the agency that the 1982 Rules were applicable to the U......
  • Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 06-2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 26 Agosto 2009
    ...in January 2005; similarly, these new rules prescribe that the USFS "must take into account the best available science." See 36 C.F.R. §§ 219.11 (2008); 70 Fed.Reg. 1023, 1027 (Jan. 5, As thoroughly explained by the district court, Forest Guardians had argued to the agency that the 1982 Rul......
  • Fed. Forest Res. Coal. v. Vilsack, Civil Action No. 12–1333 KBJ
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 28 Abril 2015
    ...in part that “[n]o timber harvest for the purposes of timber production may occur on lands not suited for timber production.” 36 C.F.R. § 219.11(d). Plaintiffs claim that this provision violates the NFMA because, while that law does provide that no timber harvest shall occur on lands that a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
  • Sierra Club v. Glickman, No. 9:85-CV-69.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • 14 Agosto 1997
    ...Page 935 requirements that will provide a basis for a periodic determination and evaluation of the effects of management practices." 36 C.F.R. § 219.11(d). In conducting inventorying and monitoring, the Forest Service is required to continually identify research Research needs for managemen......
  • Guardians v. United States Forest Serv., No. 06–2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 21 Abril 2011
    ...new rules prescribe that the USFS “must take into account the best available science.” 70 Fed.Reg. 1023, 1027 (Jan. 5, 2005); see 36 C.F.R. §§ 219.11 (2008). As thoroughly explained by the district court, Forest Guardians had argued to the agency that the 1982 Rules were applicable to the U......
  • Forest Guardians v. U.S. Forest Service, No. 06-2306.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • 26 Agosto 2009
    ...in January 2005; similarly, these new rules prescribe that the USFS "must take into account the best available science." See 36 C.F.R. §§ 219.11 (2008); 70 Fed.Reg. 1023, 1027 (Jan. 5, As thoroughly explained by the district court, Forest Guardians had argued to the agency that the 1982 Rul......
  • Fed. Forest Res. Coal. v. Vilsack, Civil Action No. 12–1333 KBJ
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 28 Abril 2015
    ...in part that “[n]o timber harvest for the purposes of timber production may occur on lands not suited for timber production.” 36 C.F.R. § 219.11(d). Plaintiffs claim that this provision violates the NFMA because, while that law does provide that no timber harvest shall occur on lands that a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT