10 CFR 212.78 - Tertiary incentive crude oil
| Cite as | 10 CFR 212.78 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
124 practice notes
-
Gulf Oil Corp. v. U.S. Dept. of Energy, No. 80-2096
...include the three appellees and Marathon Oil Co., Standard Oil of Indiana (AMOCO), Standard Oil of Ohio (Sohio) and Texaco, Inc. 2 10 C.F.R. Part 212 3 The precursors of the Department of Energy were the Cost of Living Council (COLC) (August 1973-December 1973), the Federal Energy Office (F......
-
Pennzoil Co. v. United States Dept. of Energy, No. 3-27.
...feature of the petroleum pricing regulations applied to domestic producers of crude oil was the "two-tier" pricing structure. 10 C.F.R. Part 212, Subpart D. The system was adopted to minimize the inflationary impact of worldwide oil prices and to provide an incentive for increased......
-
Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. Murphy Oil Corp., No. G79-14 CA6.
...COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT Count I of plaintiff's complaint alleges that Murphy Oil violated the Mandatory Petroleum Price Regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 212 (1975) (Price Regulations),5 by exceeding the maximum allowable price which Murphy Oil could charge under the regulations. The rule for de......
-
United States v. Exxon Corp., No. DC-91 to DC-100.
...the four sales of domestic crude oil, and the maximum lawful selling price for the resale of domestic crude oil, 6 C.F.R. part 150 and 10 C.F.R. part 212, this Court reviews the relief fashioned by the district court judge. The counterclaim seeks judgment requiring plaintiffs to pay into an......
Request a trial to view additional results
123 cases
-
Gulf Oil Corp. v. U.S. Dept. of Energy, No. 80-2096
...include the three appellees and Marathon Oil Co., Standard Oil of Indiana (AMOCO), Standard Oil of Ohio (Sohio) and Texaco, Inc. 2 10 C.F.R. Part 212 3 The precursors of the Department of Energy were the Cost of Living Council (COLC) (August 1973-December 1973), the Federal Energy Office (F......
-
Pennzoil Co. v. United States Dept. of Energy, No. 3-27.
...A basic feature of the petroleum pricing regulations applied to domestic producers of crude oil was the "two-tier" pricing structure. 10 C.F.R. Part 212, Subpart D. The system was adopted to minimize the inflationary impact of worldwide oil prices and to provide an incentive for increased d......
-
Naph-Sol Refining Co. v. Murphy Oil Corp., No. G79-14 CA6.
...COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT Count I of plaintiff's complaint alleges that Murphy Oil violated the Mandatory Petroleum Price Regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 212 (1975) (Price Regulations),5 by exceeding the maximum allowable price which Murphy Oil could charge under the regulations. The rule for de......
-
United States v. Exxon Corp., No. DC-91 to DC-100.
...the four sales of domestic crude oil, and the maximum lawful selling price for the resale of domestic crude oil, 6 C.F.R. part 150 and 10 C.F.R. part 212, this Court reviews the relief fashioned by the district court judge. The counterclaim seeks judgment requiring plaintiffs to pay into an......
Request a trial to view additional results