34 CFR 395.35 - Terms of permit
| Cite as | 34 CFR 395.35 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 practice notes
-
Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of Columbia, Civ. A. No. 88-0142-OG.
...Vendors of America v. Weinberger, 795 F.2d 90, 93, 102 (D.C.Cir.1986); see 20 U.S.C. § 107a(a)(5), (c); 34 C.F.R. §§ 395.7, 395.16, 395.35. Finally, the Secretary is required to ensure, through appropriate regulations, that licensed vendors receive uniform and adequate training, including o......
-
Jacobsen v. U.S. Postal Service, No. 89-16054
...for the Federal property of the property managing department, agency, or instrumentality, to be suitable for a particular location. 34 C.F.R. § 395.35(c)(3). Moreover, the permit "shall further provide that installation ... shall be subject to the prior approval and supervision of the on-si......
-
State of NY v. US Postal Service, No. 86 Civ. 2853 (JMC).
...federal agencies for permits allowing them to establish sites for the blind vendors on federal property. Id. § 107a(c); 34 C.F.R. §§ 395.16, 395.35. When a dispute arises, the Act provides (a) Any blind licensee who is dissatisfied with any action arising from the operation or administratio......
-
Marlar v. State, No. 1
...to the foregoing provision is another remedy available to DES where a vendor conducts his business in a discriminatory fashion. See 34 C.F.R. § 395.35(a)(2) V. ATTORNEYS' FEES The trial judge awarded Marlar $14,959.50 in attorneys' fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-348, which provides for an awa......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Committee of Blind Vendors v. District of Columbia, Civ. A. No. 88-0142-OG.
...Vendors of America v. Weinberger, 795 F.2d 90, 93, 102 (D.C.Cir.1986); see 20 U.S.C. § 107a(a)(5), (c); 34 C.F.R. §§ 395.7, 395.16, 395.35. Finally, the Secretary is required to ensure, through appropriate regulations, that licensed vendors receive uniform and adequate training, including o......
-
Jacobsen v. U.S. Postal Service, No. 89-16054
...for the Federal property of the property managing department, agency, or instrumentality, to be suitable for a particular location. 34 C.F.R. § 395.35(c)(3). Moreover, the permit "shall further provide that installation ... shall be subject to the prior approval and supervision of the on-si......
-
State of NY v. US Postal Service, No. 86 Civ. 2853 (JMC).
...federal agencies for permits allowing them to establish sites for the blind vendors on federal property. Id. § 107a(c); 34 C.F.R. §§ 395.16, 395.35. When a dispute arises, the Act provides (a) Any blind licensee who is dissatisfied with any action arising from the operation or administratio......
-
Marlar v. State, No. 1
...to the foregoing provision is another remedy available to DES where a vendor conducts his business in a discriminatory fashion. See 34 C.F.R. § 395.35(a)(2) V. ATTORNEYS' FEES The trial judge awarded Marlar $14,959.50 in attorneys' fees pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-348, which provides for an awa......
Request a trial to view additional results