28 CFR 9.7 - Terms and conditions of remission and mitigation
| Cite as | 28 CFR 9.7 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 practice notes
-
U.S. v. Sweeney, Nos. 81-1021
...methamphetamine, we need not reach the issue of the sufficiency of notice given by the DEA to Hughes pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 1316.71-81 and 28 C.F.R. 9.7. Therefore, we reverse the ruling of the lower court ordering the DEA to return the $7,500 to Hughes pursuant to Rule 41(e), and rule that ......
-
Tourus v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 00-1132
...a category of administrative decisions to which the judicial review provisions of the APA are inapplicable. 5 U.S.C. 701(a)(2); see 28 C.F.R. 9.7(a)(1) (2000) ("Whether the property or a monetary equivalent will be remitted to an owner shall be determined at the discretion of the Ruling But......
-
Burke v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Dea, Civil Action No. 95-D-642-N.
...provide general guidance on the terms and conditions of remission, they do not mention or contemplate recision of such a decision. See 28 C.F.R. § 9.7. The section coming closest to imposing conditions on grants of remission is 28 C.F.R. § 9.7, which requires lienholders to comply with cert......
-
Paret-Ruiz v. United States, No. 14–2134
...within the agency's discretion. See Malladi Drugs & Pharms., Ltd. v. Tandy , 552 F.3d 885, 887–88 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing 28 C.F.R. §§ 9.3, 9.7 ). Two aspects of civil forfeiture are of particular note here. First, the government may pursue civil forfeiture simultaneously with a criminal p......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
U.S. v. Sweeney, Nos. 81-1021
...methamphetamine, we need not reach the issue of the sufficiency of notice given by the DEA to Hughes pursuant to 21 C.F.R. 1316.71-81 and 28 C.F.R. 9.7. Therefore, we reverse the ruling of the lower court ordering the DEA to return the $7,500 to Hughes pursuant to Rule 41(e), and rule that ......
-
Tourus v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 00-1132
...a category of administrative decisions to which the judicial review provisions of the APA are inapplicable. 5 U.S.C. 701(a)(2); see 28 C.F.R. 9.7(a)(1) (2000) ("Whether the property or a monetary equivalent will be remitted to an owner shall be determined at the discretion of the Ruling But......
-
Burke v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Dea, Civil Action No. 95-D-642-N.
...provide general guidance on the terms and conditions of remission, they do not mention or contemplate recision of such a decision. See 28 C.F.R. § 9.7. The section coming closest to imposing conditions on grants of remission is 28 C.F.R. § 9.7, which requires lienholders to comply with cert......
-
Paret-Ruiz v. United States, No. 14–2134
...within the agency's discretion. See Malladi Drugs & Pharms., Ltd. v. Tandy , 552 F.3d 885, 887–88 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (citing 28 C.F.R. §§ 9.3, 9.7 ). Two aspects of civil forfeiture are of particular note here. First, the government may pursue civil forfeiture simultaneously with a criminal p......
Request a trial to view additional results