10 CFR 50.36a - Technical specifications on effluents from nuclear power reactors
| Cite as | 10 CFR 50.36a |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
44 practice notes
-
Akins v. Sacramento Mun. Utility Dist., No. C009871
...of operation while ensuring that exposure to actual members of the public will not exceed the EPA limitations adopted by the NRC. (10 C.F.R. § 50.36a, subd. (b) (1991).) But the appendix I guidelines are not safety regulations. With respect to these guidelines, NRC regulations provide: "The......
-
McCafferty v. Centerior Service Co., No. 1:95-CV-1732.
...in different facilities and strict compliance with ALARA specifications may be suspended to allow for "operational flexibility." 10 C.F.R. § 50.36a(b). This issue of the correct federal standard was addressed more fully by the Third Circuit in In re TMI, 67 F.3d 1103 (3rd Cir. 1995), cert. ......
-
Union of Concerned Scientists v. Atomic Energy Com'n, No. 73-1099.
...use of a radiological waste system, and periodic reporting of the actual quantity of radio-nuclides released to unrestricted areas. 10 C.F.R. § 50.36a. On the basis of experience, the AEC expects compliance with these required technical specifications actually to "keep average annual releas......
-
Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc, No. 74-1270
...be designed to keep levels of radioactive material in effluents "as low as is reasonably achievable." 10 CFR § 50.34a (1976). See also 10 CFR §§ 50.36a, 50.57(a)(3), (6) (1976)5 Page 7 The FWPCA established a regulatory program to control and abate water pollution, stating as its ultimate o......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
-
Akins v. Sacramento Mun. Utility Dist., No. C009871
...of operation while ensuring that exposure to actual members of the public will not exceed the EPA limitations adopted by the NRC. (10 C.F.R. § 50.36a, subd. (b) (1991).) But the appendix I guidelines are not safety regulations. With respect to these guidelines, NRC regulations provide: "The......
-
McCafferty v. Centerior Service Co., No. 1:95-CV-1732.
...in different facilities and strict compliance with ALARA specifications may be suspended to allow for "operational flexibility." 10 C.F.R. § 50.36a(b). This issue of the correct federal standard was addressed more fully by the Third Circuit in In re TMI, 67 F.3d 1103 (3rd Cir. 1995), cert. ......
-
Union of Concerned Scientists v. Atomic Energy Com'n, No. 73-1099.
...use of a radiological waste system, and periodic reporting of the actual quantity of radio-nuclides released to unrestricted areas. 10 C.F.R. § 50.36a. On the basis of experience, the AEC expects compliance with these required technical specifications actually to "keep average annual releas......
-
Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc, No. 74-1270
...be designed to keep levels of radioactive material in effluents "as low as is reasonably achievable." 10 CFR § 50.34a (1976). See also 10 CFR §§ 50.36a, 50.57(a)(3), (6) (1976)5 Page 7 The FWPCA established a regulatory program to control and abate water pollution, stating as its ultimate o......
Request a trial to view additional results