38 C.F.R. §19.31 - Supplemental statement of the case

Cite as38 C.F.R. §19.31
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
21 cases
  • Disabled American Veterans v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 02-7304, -7305, -7316.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • May 1, 2003
    ...(collectively "petitioners") petition for review of regulations promulgated by the Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA"), 38 C.F.R. §§ 19.9, 19.31, 20.903, 20.1304, that permit the Board of Veterans' Appeals ("Board") to obtain evidence, clarify the evidence, cure a procedural defect, or Pa......
  • Disabled American v. Sec. of Veterans Affairs, 02-7304.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • May 1, 2003
    ...(collectively "petitioners") petition for review of regulations promulgated by the Department of Veterans Affairs ("VA"), 38 C.F.R. §§ 19.9, 19.31, 20.903, 20.1304 (2002), that permit the Board of Veterans' Appeals ("Board") to obtain evidence, clarify the evidence, cure a procedural defect......
  • Sprinkle v. Shinseki, 2012–7156.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • October 24, 2013
    ...evidence that the claimant presents there-after must be addressed by the Regional Office in a Supplemental Statement of the Case. 38 C.F.R. §§ 19.31(b), 19.37(a). Congress created a narrow exception to this first-instance consideration of evidence by the Regional Office, providing that “whe......
  • Sims v. Shinseki, 2008-7082.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 13, 2009
    ...of the case to the Board. Before the Board, Sims argued that the RO's issuance of an SSOC in July 2004 was improper, because under 38 C.F.R. § 19.31(a) the request to reopen and the claim of service connection were separate "issues." Sims also argued that the SSOC failed to comply with the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT