18 C.F.R. §385.602 - Submission of settlement offers (Rule 602)
| Cite as | 18 C.F.R. §385.602 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
41 cases
-
Green Island Power Authority v. F.E.R.C., Docket No. 07-1737-ag(L).
...In March 2005, Erie filed an offer of settlement (the "Offer of Settlement") with FERC pursuant to Rule 602 of FERC's regulations. See 18 C.F.R. § 385.602. The Offer of Settlement, which was signed by Erie, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, NYS DEC, New......
-
Cnty. of Butte v. Dep't of Water Res., C071785
...evidence upon which to base a reasoned decision or it determines there is no genuine 252 Cal.Rptr.3d 448 issue of material fact.17 ( 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(h)(1)(i) (2003).)Second, the DEIR provides an analysis for the preparation of a "water quality certification for the Proposed Project from......
-
Narragansett Elec. v. Constellation Energy Commod., C.A. No. 06-404S.
...FERC can sever parties or issues from a contested settlement and approve the settlement as uncontested among the settling parties. 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(h). Severance may enable a party to litigate contested issues while permitting FERC to approve uncontested matters to "bring needed stabilit......
-
Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. F.E.R.C., 92-9121.
...evidence upon which to base a reasoned decision or the Commission determines that there is no genuine issue of material fact." 18 C.F.R. § 385.602(h)(1)(i). In considering the arguments of Atlanta Gas in its petition for rehearing of the 1992 Order, the Commission found that the record, whi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
9th Circuit Remands Two California Energy Crisis-Related Settlements for Reconsideration by FERC
...forth in Trailblazer Pipeline Co.,3 and for failing to conduct a merits analysis of the Tacoma settlement under its own regulations (18 C.F.R. § 385.602(h)).4 The court stated that “[e]ven affording FERC substantial latitude in interpreting and applying its own regulations, FERC’s recogniti......