21 CFR 1316.57 - Submission of documentary evidence and affidavits and identification of witnesses subsequent to prehearing conference

Cite as21 CFR 1316.57
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Edge Pharmacy; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 19, 2016
    • October 19, 2016
    ...to excuse the untimely filing.\21\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \19\ Respondent cited to 21 CFR 1316.57 as support for its contention that the Government was required to establish ``good cause'' to accept its untimely filing. Respondent's Resp.......
  • Decisions and Orders:
    • United States
    • Federal Register August 30, 2011
    • August 30, 2011
    ...considered these documents in reaching my findings and conclusions, however, because they were not offered or admitted into evidence. See 21 CFR 1316.57. Respondent also makes several references to testimony that was offered in related state proceedings; that information also will not be co......
  • Miami-Luken, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, Case No. 1:16-mc-012
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • July 15, 2016
    ..."DEA cannot use any new documents at the hearing, at least without first providing them to Miami-Luken." (Doc. 11, PageID 219) (citing 21 C.F.R. § 1316.57). DEA also posits that if the requested documents are not necessary, the subpoena is not "'in accordance with law' and cannot be judicia......
  • Daniel B. Brubaker, D.O.; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register March 30, 2012
    • March 30, 2012
    ...20, 2010, was ``substantially deficient and does not comply with the directions set forth in the Order for Prehearing Statements or 21 C.F.R. Sec. 1316.57, I do not find at this time that Respondent's actions constitute a waiver of hearing.'' (Mem. to Counsel and Order, July 30, 2010.) I or......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 cases
  • Miami-Luken, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice, Case No. 1:16-mc-012
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • July 15, 2016
    ..."DEA cannot use any new documents at the hearing, at least without first providing them to Miami-Luken." (Doc. 11, PageID 219) (citing 21 C.F.R. § 1316.57). DEA also posits that if the requested documents are not necessary, the subpoena is not "'in accordance with law' and cannot be judicia......
  • Roberts v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, No. 92-1375
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • June 15, 1992
    ...ALJ correctly refused to allow a certain individual to testify on Roberts' behalf because Roberts did not comply with 21 C.F.R. §§ 1316.55, 1316.57 (1992) in that he failed to give the ALJ and government counsel notice that he intended to call that individual as a witness at his hearing. Ac......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT