21 CFR 1316.59 - Submission and receipt of evidence
| Cite as | 21 CFR 1316.59 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
71 practice notes
-
Perry County Food & Drug Decision and Order
...records, of which I take official notice, Respondent did not file its renewal application until March 3, 2015. See 5 U.S.C. 556(e); 21 CFR 1316.59(e). Significantly, at the time Respondent filed its renewal application, it had previously been served with the Order to Show Cause and Immediat......
-
Farmacia Yani; Decision and Order
...Id. at 29. (Indeed, I have taken official notice that the DEA registration validation web-tool provides this information. See 21 CFR 1316.59(e)). Moreover, the ALJ entirely ignored Ms. Soto's testimony (which is corroborated by the Government's evidence), that following the audit by a healt......
-
David A. Ruben, M.D.; Decision and Order
...\3\ Under Agency regulations, at the hearing, the ALJ ``shall admit only evidence that is competent and relevant.'' 21 CFR 1316.59(a). If, as the Government argues, such evidence was barred by the doctrine of res judicata (or more precisely, collateral estoppel) the admission of such eviden......
-
JM Pharmacy Group, Inc., d/b/a Farmacia Nueva and Best Pharma Corp; Decision and Order
...recognition, and inclusion of material facts in the administrative record by the taking of official notice. 5 U.S.C. 556(e); 21 CFR 1316.59(e); Attorney General's Manual on the Administrative Procedure Act Sec. 7(d) (1947). To the extent either party seeks to challenge the factual predicate......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
-
Craker v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 09–1220.
...reconsideration to refute any facts of which the Administrator had taken official notice during the proceedings. Id. at 2108 n. 24;see21 C.F.R. § 1316.59(e). Availing himself of the opportunity, Dr. Craker filed a motion for reconsideration in January 2009. He also requested that the hearin......
-
Craker v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 09-1220
...to refute any facts of which the Administrator had taken official notice during the proceedings. Id. at 2108 n.24; see 21 C.F.R. § 1316.59(e).Page 13 Availing himself of the opportunity, Dr. Craker filed a motion for reconsideration in January 2009. He also requested that the hearing be reo......
-
Klinestiver v. Drug Enforcement Administration, No. 78-2178
...402 U.S. 389, 402, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). Nonetheless, petitioner contends that the applicable DEA regulation, 21 C.F.R. § 1316.59(a) (1978) erects a higher standard for the admissibility of evidence in a DEA hearing, permitting the introduction only of evidence that would be......