21 CFR 1316.59 - Submission and receipt of evidence

Cite as21 CFR 1316.59
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
71 practice notes
  • Decisions and Orders:
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 03, 2011
    • October 3, 2011
    ...it proper to give weight to relevant portions of affidavits of Respondent and Respondent's employees and patients. See 5 U.S.C. 556(d); 21 CFR 1316.59(a) Substantive Issue Whether a preponderance of the evidence establishes that, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(4), Respondent's DEA COR BR52873......
  • Masters Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register September 15, 2015
    • September 15, 2015
    ...of the distance between Port Charlotte and Sarasota as determined by using the online Rand McNally mileage calculator. Pursuant to 21 CFR 1316.59(e), Respondent may dispute this finding by filing a properly supported motion no later than 10 days from the date of this Ms. Seiple further asse......
  • Farmacia Yani; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 20, 2015
    • May 20, 2015
    ...Id. at 29. (Indeed, I have taken official notice that the DEA registration validation web-tool provides this information. See 21 CFR 1316.59(e)). Moreover, the ALJ entirely ignored Ms. Soto's testimony (which is corroborated by the Government's evidence), that following the audit by a healt......
  • Trinity Pharmacy II; Decision and Order
    • United States
    • Federal Register February 20, 2018
    • February 20, 2018
    ...ALJ's to admit expert testimony even where the expert was not licensed in the state where the violations were alleged to have occurred. 21 CFR 1316.59(b) (``Opinion testimony shall be admitted when the presiding officer is satisfied that the witness is properly qualified''); Grider Drug #1 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Craker v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 09–1220.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • April 15, 2013
    ...reconsideration to refute any facts of which the Administrator had taken official notice during the proceedings. Id. at 2108 n. 24;see21 C.F.R. § 1316.59(e). Availing himself of the opportunity, Dr. Craker filed a motion for reconsideration in January 2009. He also requested that the hearin......
  • Craker v. Drug Enforcement Admin., No. 09-1220
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (1st Circuit)
    • April 15, 2013
    ...to refute any facts of which the Administrator had taken official notice during the proceedings. Id. at 2108 n.24; see 21 C.F.R. § 1316.59(e).Page 13 Availing himself of the opportunity, Dr. Craker filed a motion for reconsideration in January 2009. He also requested that the hearing be reo......
  • Klinestiver v. Drug Enforcement Administration, No. 78-2178
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • June 22, 1979
    ...402 U.S. 389, 402, 91 S.Ct. 1420, 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971). Nonetheless, petitioner contends that the applicable DEA regulation, 21 C.F.R. § 1316.59(a) (1978) erects a higher standard for the admissibility of evidence in a DEA hearing, permitting the introduction only of evidence that would be......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT