38 C.F.R. §19.29 - Statement of the Case
| Cite as | 38 C.F.R. §19.29 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Marozsan v. US, Civ. No. 3:84cv0500 AS.
...a summary of the evidence and the applicable laws and regulations, together with a determination on each issue. 38 C.F.R. §§ 19.26, 19.29. The claimant may then appeal to the Board of Veterans' Appeals ("BVA"). A hearing before the BVA will be granted if the claimant expresses a desire to a......
-
Disabled American Veterans v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 02-7304, -7305, -7316.
...of how those laws and regulations affect the decision, and a summary of the reasons for the decision. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d)(1); 38 C.F.R. § 19.29; see Maggitt v. West, 202 F.3d 1370, 1375 (Fed. Cir. To complete the appeal to the Board, the claimant is required to file a Substantive Appeal wit......
-
Disabled American v. Sec. of Veterans Affairs, 02-7304.
...of how those laws and regulations affect the decision, and a summary of the reasons for the decision. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d)(1); 38 C.F.R. § 19.29 (2002); see Maggitt v. West, 202 F.3d 1370, 1375 (Fed. To complete the appeal to the Board, the claimant is required to file a Substantive Appeal w......
-
Martin v. O'Rourke, 2017-1747
...affect the agency's decision.(C) The decision on each issue and a summary of the reasons for such decision.38 U.S.C. § 7105(d)(1) ; see 38 C.F.R. § 19.29.3 The appeals of four other individuals were consolidated under a separate appeal number. Rose v. O'Rourke , No. 17-1762. The consolidate......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
GSB Vol. 7, No. 4 - #2. DEFENDING AMERICA'S DEFENDERS: Advocating on Behalf of Georgia's Military Veterans.
...38 U.S.C. 5107(b) (1994). Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 54 (1990). 38 C.F.R. 20.201 (1994). 38 U.S.C. 7105(d) (1994); 38 C.F.R. 19.29 38 C.F.R. 20.302(b) (2001). 38 U.S.C. 7104(a) (1994). See also Litke v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 90, 93 (1990) (remand is appropriate where the BVA has ......