25 CFR 2.10 - Statement of reasons
| Cite as | 25 CFR 2.10 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
12 practice notes
-
Kennerly v. United States, No. CV-81-3-GF.
...may then be made to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs; further appeals from the decision of the Commissioner may be made to the IBIA. 25 C.F.R. §§ 2.10-2.20 provide the specific procedures governing appeals to the Area Director and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. 25 C.F.R. § 2.18 delin......
-
Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. Impson, No. CV-05-168-B-W.
...the BIA conceded at oral argument. See Hopi Tribe v. Navajo Tribe, 46 F.3d 908, 920-21 (9th Cir.1995) (regarding filing of appeals under 25 C.F.R. § 2.10). Taken literally, the language "the time to file a notice of appeal ... shall not begin to run" could mean that the Plaintiffs cannot ex......
-
Hopi Tribe v. Navajo Tribe, Nos. 92-16448
...of the final determination and more than one month after the expiration of the 30-day period for appeal under the 1985 version of 25 C.F.R. Sec. 2.10(a), the version of the BIA regulation governing administrative appeals which is applicable The Hopi Tribe moved to dismiss the Navajo Nation'......
-
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. U.S., CHEYENNE-ARAPAHO
...written notice as per 25 C.F.R. § 2.4, and concluding that the Tribe's filing of its appeal on August 5, 1981 was not untimely under 25 C.F.R. § 2.10. In addition, the district court found that Woods failed to demonstrate that it had been prejudiced by the delay in the filing of the Tribe's......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 cases
-
Kennerly v. United States, No. CV-81-3-GF.
...may then be made to the Commissioner of Indian Affairs; further appeals from the decision of the Commissioner may be made to the IBIA. 25 C.F.R. §§ 2.10-2.20 provide the specific procedures governing appeals to the Area Director and the Commissioner of Indian Affairs. 25 C.F.R. § 2.18 delin......
-
Nulankeyutmonen Nkihtaqmikon v. Impson, No. CV-05-168-B-W.
...the BIA conceded at oral argument. See Hopi Tribe v. Navajo Tribe, 46 F.3d 908, 920-21 (9th Cir.1995) (regarding filing of appeals under 25 C.F.R. § 2.10). Taken literally, the language "the time to file a notice of appeal ... shall not begin to run" could mean that the Plaintiffs cannot ex......
-
Hopi Tribe v. Navajo Tribe, Nos. 92-16448
...of the final determination and more than one month after the expiration of the 30-day period for appeal under the 1985 version of 25 C.F.R. Sec. 2.10(a), the version of the BIA regulation governing administrative appeals which is applicable The Hopi Tribe moved to dismiss the Navajo Nation'......
-
Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma v. U.S., CHEYENNE-ARAPAHO
...written notice as per 25 C.F.R. § 2.4, and concluding that the Tribe's filing of its appeal on August 5, 1981 was not untimely under 25 C.F.R. § 2.10. In addition, the district court found that Woods failed to demonstrate that it had been prejudiced by the delay in the filing of the Tribe's......
Request a trial to view additional results