37 C.F.R. §1.530 - Statement by patent owner in ex parte reexamination; amendment by patent owner in ex parte or inter partes reexamination; inventorship change in ex parte or inter partes reexamination

Cite as37 C.F.R. §1.530
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
87 cases
  • Canady v. Erbe Elektromedizin Gmbh, No. CIV.A. 96-2012(RMU).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 31 Julio 2002
    ...PTO will "expidite[] to the extent possible" the reexamination proceedings following receipt of the statement by the patent owner under 37 C.F.R. § 1.530 and the reply by the requestor under 37 C.F.R. § 1.535. M.P.E.P. § 2241. The PTO states that a grant of reexamination need only Page 69 a......
  • Synqor, Inc. v. Vicor Corp., 2019-1704
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • 22 Febrero 2021
    ...Since the ’190 patent expired before the appeals of the patentability of claims 34–38 terminated, the claims will never issue. See 37 C.F.R. § 1.530(j) ("[N]o amendment, other than the cancellation of claims, will be incorporated into the patent by a [reexamination] certificate issued after......
  • Marine Polymer Techs., Inc. v. Hemcon, Inc., 2010–1548.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • 15 Marzo 2012
    ...§ 1.114(c) (distinguishing between prosecution arguments and amendments to the specification, claims, or drawings). FN11. See, e.g., 37 C.F.R. § 1.530(d) (“A proposed amendment in an ex parte or an inter partes reexamination proceeding is made by filing a paper directing that proposed speci......
  • Patlex Corp., Inc. v. Mossinghoff, Civ. A. No. 82-5472.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • 17 Noviembre 1983
    ...request is considered ex parte by the PTO, and the PTO does not permit the patent owner to challenge the request for reexamination. 37 C.F.R. § 1.530(a). The regulations state that "no statement ... by the patent owner ... will ... be acknowledged or considered in making the determination" ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 firm's commentaries
4 books & journal articles
  • Notice and Prefiling Considerations
    • United States
    • ABA General Library ANDA litigation: strategies and tactics for pharmaceutical patent litigators
    • 2 Junio 2016
    ...reconsider or correct information believed to be relevant to the patent.”48Patent owners can request supplemental 40. 35 U.S.C. § 304; 37 C.F.R. § 1.530(b). 41. 35 U.S.C. § 305. 42. 35 U.S.C. § 251. 43. THE MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE § 1402 (9th ed., Mar. 2014). 44. 35 U.S.C. § 25......
  • Patent Due Diligence
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Intellectual Property and Technology Due Diligence
    • 1 Enero 2018
    ...determine the status of the case and likelihood of success. 22. 35 U.S.C. § 302; see also 37 C.F.R. § 1.510. 23. 37 C.F.R. § 1.565. 24. 37 C.F.R. § 1.530. 246 ChAPTEr B. Inter Partes Re-Examination, Postgrant Review, and Inter Partes Review An inter partes re-examination is like the ex part......
  • Basics of Intellectual Property Laws for the Antitrust Practitioner
    • United States
    • ABA Antitrust Library Antitrust Counterattack in Intellectual Property Litigation Handbook
    • 1 Enero 2010
    ...Id. . 107. 35 U.S.C. §§ 301–302; 37 C.F.R. § 1.510. 108. 35 U.S.C. §§ 303–304; 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.515, 1.525. 109. 35 U.S.C. §§ 304–305; 37 C.F.R. § 1.530(b). 110. 35 U.S.C. §§ 304; 37 C.F.R. § 1.535. 111. 35 U.S.C. § 307; 37 C.F.R. § 1.570. Basics of Intellectual Property Laws for the Antitrus......
  • Risk Management
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Patent freedom to operate searches, opinions, techniques, and studies
    • 11 Agosto 2017
    ...35 U.S.C. § 302; 37 C.F.R. § 1.510; and U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, Manual of Patent Examining Procedure § 2211 (9th ed. 2015). 122 37 C.F.R. §§ 1.530 and 123 35 U.S.C. §§ 321 and 322. zue59005_08_c08_329-392.indd 382 7/20/17 8:38 AM Chapter 8: Risk Management 383 should not be granted.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT