38 CFR 14.632 - Standards of conduct for persons providing representation before the Department

Cite as38 CFR 14.632
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
8 practice notes
  • VA Claims and Appeals Modernization
    • United States
    • Veterans Affairs Department
    • Invalid date
    ...attorney, or former agent or attorney, is without protection and/or potential recourse. First, pursuant to VA's standards of conduct in 38 CFR 14.632, attorneys and agents are prohibited from charging, soliciting, or receiving fees that are clearly unreasonable, and, if an attorney or agent......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 22, 2008
    • May 22, 2008
    ...that Congress did not intend to prohibit ``adversarial'' conduct to the extent that such conduct meets the standard established by VA in 38 CFR 14.632 and is consistent with ethical advocacy on behalf of a claimant contesting an initial VA decision on a However, we do not interpret the amen......
  • Part IV
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 07, 2007
    • May 7, 2007
    ...any question concerning the current qualifications of an accredited service organization representative, agent, or attorney. Current 38 CFR 14.632 also tasks the Regional Counsel of jurisdiction with determining the qualifications of prospective representatives, agents, and attorneys. Consi......
  • Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006; implementation: Accreditation of agents and attorneys; agent and attorney fees,
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 07, 2007
    • May 7, 2007
    ...any question concerning the current qualifications of an accredited service organization representative, agent, or attorney. Current 38 CFR 14.632 also tasks the Regional Counsel of jurisdiction with determining the qualifications of prospective representatives, agents, and attorneys. Consi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 cases
  • Rosinski v. Wilkie, 18-0678
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims
    • January 24, 2019
    ...of factual errors in draft rating decisions will lead to unnecessary delay in certain claims, causing him to forego new clients. See 38 C.F.R. § 14.632(b) (2018). The petitioner also argues that he suffers an intangible harm through interference with the attorney-client relationship, result......
  • Rosinski v. Wilkie, 18-0678
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims
    • January 24, 2019
    ...of factual errors in draft rating decisions will lead to unnecessary delay in certain claims, causing him to forego new clients. See 38 C.F.R. § 14.632(b) (2018). The petitioner also argues that he suffers an intangible harm through interference with the attorney-client relationship, result......
  • Cox v. McDonough, 19-3317
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals for Veteran Claims
    • May 12, 2021
    ...Illinois Rules of Professional Conduct because the attorney in that case was an Illinois bar member). [88] 73 Fed. Reg. 29, 866. [89] 38 C.F.R. § 14.632(d) (2019). [90] § 14.636(e)(9) (2019). [91] VA Claims and Appeals Modernization, 84 Fed. Reg. 138, 151 (Jan. 18, 2019) (emphasis added). T......
4 provisions
  • VA Claims and Appeals Modernization
    • United States
    • Veterans Affairs Department
    • Invalid date
    ...attorney, or former agent or attorney, is without protection and/or potential recourse. First, pursuant to VA's standards of conduct in 38 CFR 14.632, attorneys and agents are prohibited from charging, soliciting, or receiving fees that are clearly unreasonable, and, if an attorney or agent......
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 22, 2008
    • May 22, 2008
    ...that Congress did not intend to prohibit ``adversarial'' conduct to the extent that such conduct meets the standard established by VA in 38 CFR 14.632 and is consistent with ethical advocacy on behalf of a claimant contesting an initial VA decision on a However, we do not interpret the amen......
  • Part IV
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 07, 2007
    • May 7, 2007
    ...any question concerning the current qualifications of an accredited service organization representative, agent, or attorney. Current 38 CFR 14.632 also tasks the Regional Counsel of jurisdiction with determining the qualifications of prospective representatives, agents, and attorneys. Consi......
  • Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006; implementation: Accreditation of agents and attorneys; agent and attorney fees,
    • United States
    • Federal Register May 07, 2007
    • May 7, 2007
    ...any question concerning the current qualifications of an accredited service organization representative, agent, or attorney. Current 38 CFR 14.632 also tasks the Regional Counsel of jurisdiction with determining the qualifications of prospective representatives, agents, and attorneys. Consi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT