32 CFR 154.6 - Standards for access to classified information or assignment to sensitive duties

Cite as32 CFR 154.6
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Kaplan v. Conyers, 2011-3207
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 20, 2013
    ...of an employee's ineligibility to hold a sensitive position must be "consistent with the interests of national security." See 32 C.F.R. § 154.6(b) ("The personnel security standard that must be applied to determine whether a person is eligible for access to classified information or assignm......
  • Kaplan v. Conyers, No. 2011–3207.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 20, 2013
    ...of an employee's ineligibility to hold a sensitive position must be “consistent with the interests of national security.” See 32 C.F.R. § 154.6(b) (“The personnel security standard that must be applied to determine whether a person is eligible for access to classified information or assignm......
  • High Tech Gays v. Defense Indus. Sec. Clearance Office, No. 87-2987
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • February 2, 1990
    ...classified information or assigning the person to sensitive duties is clearly consistent with the interests of national security. 32 C.F.R. Sec. 154.6(b). The ultimate decision in applying ... Sec. 154.6(b) and (c) must be an overall common sense determination based upon all available 32 C.......
  • American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, AFL-CIO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 15, 1997
    ...classified information or assigning the person to sensitive duties is clearly consistent with the interests of national security." 32 C.F.R. § 154.6(b). Incumbent employees may be subject to reinvestigation to examine their fitness for continued employment. To evaluate a person's fitness fo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Kaplan v. Conyers, 2011-3207
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 20, 2013
    ...of an employee's ineligibility to hold a sensitive position must be "consistent with the interests of national security." See 32 C.F.R. § 154.6(b) ("The personnel security standard that must be applied to determine whether a person is eligible for access to classified information or assignm......
  • Kaplan v. Conyers, No. 2011–3207.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 20, 2013
    ...of an employee's ineligibility to hold a sensitive position must be “consistent with the interests of national security.” See 32 C.F.R. § 154.6(b) (“The personnel security standard that must be applied to determine whether a person is eligible for access to classified information or assignm......
  • High Tech Gays v. Defense Indus. Sec. Clearance Office, No. 87-2987
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • February 2, 1990
    ...classified information or assigning the person to sensitive duties is clearly consistent with the interests of national security. 32 C.F.R. Sec. 154.6(b). The ultimate decision in applying ... Sec. 154.6(b) and (c) must be an overall common sense determination based upon all available 32 C.......
  • American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, AFL-CIO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 15, 1997
    ...classified information or assigning the person to sensitive duties is clearly consistent with the interests of national security." 32 C.F.R. § 154.6(b). Incumbent employees may be subject to reinvestigation to examine their fitness for continued employment. To evaluate a person's fitness fo......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT