21 CFR 201.57 - Specific requirements on content and format of labeling for human prescription drug and biological products described in section 201.56(b)(1)

Cite as21 CFR 201.57
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
377 practice notes
  • Part II
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 10, 2007
    • 10 Diciembre 2007
    ...21 USC 360gg to 360ss; 21 USC 371; 21 USC 374; 21 USC 379e; 42 USC 216; 42 USC 241; 42 USC 262; 42 USC 264 CFR Citation: 21 CFR 201.56; 21 CFR 201.57; 21 CFR 201.80 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: To amend the regulations governing the format and content of labeling for human prescription dr......
  • Introduction to Regulatory Plan and Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions, 64075-64305 [05-21048]
    • United States
    • Federal Register October 31, 2005
    • 31 Octubre 2005
    ...21 USC 360b; 21 USC 360gg to 360ss; 21 USC 371; 21 USC 374; 21 USC 379e; 42 USC 216; 42 USC 241; 42 USC 262; 42 USC 264 CFR Citation: 21 CFR 201.57 Legal To amend the regulations governing the format and content of labeling for human prescription drugs and biological products (21 CFR 201.56......
  • Introduction to the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions-Fall 2017
    • United States
    • Federal Register January 12, 2018
    • 12 Enero 2018
    ...seq.; 42 U.S.C. 262; 42 U.S.C. 264; 21 U.S.C. 371 CFR Citation: 21 CFR 208; 21 CFR 606.123 (new); 21 CFR 310.501 and 310.515 (removal); 21 CFR 201.57 (a)(18) (revision); 21 CFR 201.809(f)(2) (revision); 21 CFR 314.70(b)(2)(v)(B) (revision); 21 CFR 610.60(a)(7) (removal); . . Legal Deadline:......
  • The Regulatory Plan, 72725-72938 [06-8765]
    • United States
    • Federal Register December 11, 2006
    • 11 Diciembre 2006
    ...21 USC 360gg to 360ss; 21 USC 371; 21 USC 374; 21 USC 379e; 42 USC 216; 42 USC 241; 42 USC 262; 42 USC 264 CFR Citation: 21 CFR 201.56; 21 CFR 201.57; 21 CFR 201.80 Legal Deadline: None Abstract: To amend the regulations governing the format and content of labeling for human prescription dr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
250 cases
  • Wyeth v. Sandoz Inc, No. 5:07-CV-234-D.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • 15 Julio 2010
    ...'958 patent (claims 4, 6). 6. “Tmax” is the time after administration of a drug when the maximum plasma concentration is reached. See 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(c)(13)(C). 7. Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH v. Cobalt Pharm., Inc., 355 F.Supp.2d 586 (D.Mass.2005); Organon, Inc. v. Teva Pharm., Inc.,......
  • Carlin v. Superior Court, No. S045912
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 30 Agosto 1996
    ...of adverse reactions when differences of opinion exist within the medical community with regard to potential adverse reactions. (See 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(d) & (e) (1996) [requiring that warnings shall only be of known hazards, not theoretical hazards]; id., § 1.21(c)(1) [prohibiting the inclu......
  • Finn v. G. D. Searle & Co.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (California)
    • 29 Marzo 1984
    ...of case under a duty to warn rationale. Since the warnings which drug manufacturers provide are strictly regulated by federal law (see 21 C.F.R. § 201.57, subds. (d), (e), (g)), it would be illegal and a violation of public policy for the manufacturer to warn about adverse reactions and con......
  • O'Neal v. Smithkline Beecham Corp., No. CIV S-06-1063 FCD/DAD.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • 30 Enero 2008
    ...drug is both "safe" and "effective" under the conditions of use specified in the proposed prescribing information. 21 C.F.R. §§ 201.56(d), 201.57 (FDA must be satisfied that the drug's labeling accurately describes its indications, dosages, administration, contraindications, warnings and pr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
57 firm's commentaries
  • Daubert Decision in Baycol Raises Interesting Legal Points
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 19 Julio 2007
    ...claims concerning regulated products unless supported the manufacturer can back them up with “adequate and well controlled studies.” 21 C.F.R. §201.57(c)(3)(v); see 44 Fed. Reg. 37434, 37441 (item 35), 37446 (item 58) (FDA June 28, 1979) (discussing this requirement). Well, that’s not what ......
  • What If We Win? Off-Label Promotion & Product Liability
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 20 Marzo 2017
    ...itself remains off-label. The FDA, however, can order a drug’s label to contain statements (usually warnings) about an off-label use. 21 C.F.R. §§201.57(c)(6)(i), 201.80(e) (both phrased in terms of “required by” the FDA). That’s important because, as we discussed in more detail here, only ......
  • What If We Win? Off-Label Promotion & Product Liability
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • 20 Marzo 2017
    ...itself remains off-label. The FDA, however, can order a drug's label to contain statements (usually warnings) about an off-label use. 21 C.F.R. §§201.57(c)(6)(i), 201.80(e) (both phrased in terms of "required by" the FDA). That's important because, as we discussed in more detail here, only ......
  • “A Causal Relationship Need Not Have Been Proved”
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 8 Abril 2010
    ...as there is reasonable evidence of a causal association with a drug; a causal relationship need not have been definitely established.” 21 C.F.R. §201.57(c)(6)(i). For drugs approved before then, the FDA’s administrative standard demands that drug warnings be revised “as soon as there is rea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Big Data and Pharmacovigilance: Using Health Information Exchanges to Revolutionize Drug Safety
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 99-1, November 2013
    • 1 Noviembre 2013
    ...AND PROTECTING THE HEALTH OF THE PUBLIC 17 (2007), available at http://books.nap.edu/ openbook.php?record_id=11750&page=R1. 37. 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(c)(6)(i). 38 . CTR. FOR DRUG EVALUATION & RESEARCH & CTR. FOR BIOLOGICS EVALUATION & RESEARCH, FDA, U.S. DEP’T OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVS., GUIDANC......
  • The More Things Change: Improvement Patents, Drug Modifications, and the FDA
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review Nbr. 104-3, March 2019
    • 1 Marzo 2019
    ...The Limited Case for Penalizing Failures to Innovate , 82 U. CHI. L. REV. 1781, 1789–811 (2015). 84 . See infra Section V.B. 85 . See 21 C.F.R. § 201.57 (2018); Labeling Information for Drug Products , U.S. FOOD & DRUG ADMIN., https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/Development......
  • Save Now, Pay Later: The Unfortunate Reality of PLIVA v. Mensing
    • United States
    • Louisiana Law Review Nbr. 73-4, July 2013
    • 1 Julio 2013
    ...Clause “any [state law] to the Contrary notwithstanding,” is a non obstante provision. 136 This provision, 126. Id. (quoting 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(e) (2006)) (internal quotation marks omitted). 127. Id. 128. Id. at 2576–77. 129. Id. at 2576. Such help by the FDA would require the brand name to......
  • Nonprice Competition in “Substitute” Drugs: The FTC's Blind Spot
    • United States
    • Antitrust Bulletin Nbr. 59-3, September 2014
    • 1 Septiembre 2014
    ...ne Fo x, Th e Hid de n Rol e of Co st : Med ica re De cis io ns,Transparencyand Public Trust, 79 U. CIN. L. REV. 1, 17 (2010).25See 21 C.F.R. § 201.57(c)(6)(i).26 See 21 U.S.C. § 551(b)(1)(A); Applications for FDAApproval to Marketa New Drug, 21 C.F.R. § 314.70(a) (2014).27 Prescription Dru......
3 provisions

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT