40 C.F.R. §122.22 - Signatories to permit applications and reports (applicable to State programs, see Section 123.25)

Cite as40 C.F.R. §122.22
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
23 cases
  • Connecticut Fund for Environment, Inc. v. Upjohn Co.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Connecticut)
    • May 18, 1987
    ...F.Supp. at 451-52. Defendant was required to monitor its discharges, 40 C.F.R. § 122.41(j), and attest to the accuracy of its reports, 40 C.F.R. § 122.22(d). In fulfillment of those obligations it chose to rely on GC/CD testing system. It may not now refute its own report on the results of ......
  • US v. CPS Chemical Co., Inc., J-C-90-43.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. United States State District Court of Eastern District of Arkansas
    • November 12, 1991
    ...was prepared by qualified personnel under his or her direction or supervision and that the information is true, accurate, and complete. 40 C.F.R. § 122.22. A permittee who submits inaccurate or false data is subject to civil penalties or criminal prosecution pursuant to section 309(c) and (......
  • Public Interest Research v. Elf Atochem
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. District of New Jersey
    • March 31, 1993
    ...of compliance. Defendant was required to monitor its discharges, 40 C.F.R. § 122.41(j), and attest to the accuracy of its reports, 40 C.F.R. § 122.22(d).... It may not now refute its own report on the results of its Connecticut Fund for Env't v. Upjohn Co., 660 F.Supp. 1397, 1417 (D.Conn.19......
  • Sierra Club v. Union Oil Co. of California
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • April 3, 1987
    ...several provisions that are obviously designed to ensure utmost accuracy in the reports submitted by permittees. For instance, 40 C.F.R. Sec. 122.22 requires that a person signing a self-monitoring report shall make the following I certify under penalty of law that this document and all att......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • EPA and BSEE Team Up to Resolve Offshore Environmental Violations
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • November 7, 2014
    ...It is unclear whether this term will be interpreted as consistent with the similar provisions of the NPDES signatory rule. See 40 C.F.R. 122.22. The above certification language is almost identical to that which is required by NPDES regulations that must be signed by a responsible corporate......
2 books & journal articles
  • The basic prohibition of the clean water act
    • United States
    • Introduction to environmental law: cases and materials on water pollution control - 2d Edition
    • July 23, 2017
    ...“coal pile runof,” i.e., “the rainfall runof from or through any coal storage pile”. EPA apparently amended § 423.11 after promulgating 40 C.F.R. § 122.22, and neglected to amend § 122.22 accordingly. he next two decisions explore the courts’ interpretation of “navigable waters.” In Quivira......
  • Internal Investigations of Environmental Crimes
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 45-4, April 2015
    • April 1, 2015
    ...National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits require discharge monitoring reports with a compliance certiication. 40 C.F.R. §122.22. In addition, companies subject to TSCA must notify EPA within 30 days of information they receive that reasonably supports the conclusion t......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT