50 C.F.R. 660.140 - Shorebased IFQ Program
| Cite as | 50 C.F.R. 660.140 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Pac. Choice Seafood Co. v. Ross, No. 18-15455
...in the fishery, and prohibited any one entity from "own[ing] or control[ling]" more than 2.7 percent of the outstanding quota share. 50 C.F.R. § 660.140(d)(4)(i). The Service defined "control" to include "the ability through any means whatsoever to control or have a controlling influence ov......
-
Pac. Choice Seafood Co. v. Ross, Case No. 15–cv–05572–HSG
...of total QS of all non-whiting species fished in the Pacific Fishery that a person or entity may own or control, see 50 C.F.R. §§ 660.11, 660.140(d)(4)(i)(C) ; (2) a regulation that defines "control" as, inter alia , "the ability through any means whatsoever to control or have a controlling......
-
Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Ass'n v. Locke, No. C 10-04790 CRB
...speaking anyone eligible to own a U.S.-documented fishing vessel will be able to acquire Quota Share, which is highly divisible. 50 C.F.R. § 660.140(d)(3)(ii)(B)(2). These provisions allow for new entrants into the fishery. B22:59, A-264, A-283. In conjunction with and to support the trawl ......
-
Pac. Dawn LLC v. Pritzker, No. 14-15224
...on activity during a qualifying time period. The qualifying time period for harvesters ended in 2003, id. at 60,959 (promulgated as 50 C.F.R. § 660.140(d)(8)(iv)(C)(2) ), while the qualifying time period for shoreside processors ended in 2004, id. at 60,955 (promulgated as 50 C.F.R. § 660.1......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
-
Pac. Choice Seafood Co. v. Ross, No. 18-15455
...in the fishery, and prohibited any one entity from "own[ing] or control[ling]" more than 2.7 percent of the outstanding quota share. 50 C.F.R. § 660.140(d)(4)(i). The Service defined "control" to include "the ability through any means whatsoever to control or have a controlling influence ov......
-
Pac. Choice Seafood Co. v. Ross, Case No. 15–cv–05572–HSG
...of total QS of all non-whiting species fished in the Pacific Fishery that a person or entity may own or control, see 50 C.F.R. §§ 660.11, 660.140(d)(4)(i)(C) ; (2) a regulation that defines "control" as, inter alia , "the ability through any means whatsoever to control or have a controlling......
-
Pac. Coast Fed'n of Fishermen's Ass'n v. Locke, No. C 10-04790 CRB
...speaking anyone eligible to own a U.S.-documented fishing vessel will be able to acquire Quota Share, which is highly divisible. 50 C.F.R. § 660.140(d)(3)(ii)(B)(2). These provisions allow for new entrants into the fishery. B22:59, A-264, A-283. In conjunction with and to support the trawl ......
-
Pac. Dawn LLC v. Pritzker, No. 14-15224
...on activity during a qualifying time period. The qualifying time period for harvesters ended in 2003, id. at 60,959 (promulgated as 50 C.F.R. § 660.140(d)(8)(iv)(C)(2) ), while the qualifying time period for shoreside processors ended in 2004, id. at 60,955 (promulgated as 50 C.F.R. § 660.1......