29 CFR 1604.11 - Sexual harassment
| Cite as | 29 CFR 1604.11 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
874 practice notes
-
Discrimination on the Basis of Sex
...--------------------------------------------------------------------------- \64\ EEOC Guidelines on Discrimination Because of Sex, 29 CFR 1604.11 (1980), available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2014-title29-vol4/xml/CFR-2014-title29-vol4-part1604.xml (last accessed March 25, 2016) (pr......
-
Quid Pro Quo and Hostile Environment Harassment and Liability for Discriminatory Housing Practices Under the Fair Housing Act
...husband after he confronted the landlord, and landlord refused to make promised repairs after wife rebuffed landlord's advances). Cf. 29 CFR 1604.11(g) (EEOC regulation providing that ``where employment opportunities or benefits are granted because of an individual's submission to the emplo......
-
Implementation of the Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity Provisions of the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act
...a hostile or offensive program environment.\169\ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- \167\ See 29 CFR 1604.11(a). \168\ See 80 FR 5279, January 30, \169\ See Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228, 277-78 (1989); Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524......
-
Discrimination on the Basis of Sex
...Proposed paragraph 60-20.8(a) incorporates the provision of EEOC's Guidelines relating to sexual harassment virtually verbatim. See 29 CFR 1604.11(a). Inclusion of the EEOC language is intended to align the prohibitions of sexually harassing conduct under the Executive Order with the prohib......
Request a trial to view additional results
840 cases
-
Gliatta v. Tectum, Inc., 2:01-CV-199.
...nonemployees only when they knew or should have known of the offensive behavior and failed to take immediate and appropriate action. 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(e). In order to hold Tectum liable for Tocco's actions, Plaintiff must prove that Tectum knew or should have known of the harassment and f......
-
Ferguson v. EI duPont de Nemours and Co., Inc., Civ. A. No. 76-407
...interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment. 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a). As noted previously, and as recognized by the EEOC guidelines, cases based upon sexual harassment generally fall within two broad categories: fir......
-
Husser v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Educ., 12–CV–6095 (MKB)(JO).
...conduct of a sexual nature.’ " Meritor Sav. Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 65, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a) (1985) ). The Second Circuit distinguishes between "uninvited sexual solicitations; intimidating words or acts; [and] obscene language or ge......
-
Macarthur v. San Juan County, 2:00 CV 00584 BSJ.
...offensive working environment." `" Meritor Say. Bank, FSB v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 65, 106 S.Ct. 2399, 91 L.Ed.2d 49 (1986) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a)(3)). According to the court of Meritor states that "[f] or sexual harassment to be actionable, it must be sufficiently severe or pervasi......
Request a trial to view additional results
18 firm's commentaries
-
Steptoe & Johnson's First Look Winter 2018 Insurance Newsletter
...Griffi n et al., #MeToo: One Year Later, BLOOMBERG, Oct. 5, 2018, https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2018-me-too-anniversary/. 9 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(a). 10 42 U.S.C. § 1981a(a)(1), -b(1). 11 Facts About Retaliation, EEOC, https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/retaliation.cfm (last visited Oct 8, ......
-
NLRB General Counsel Reveals Intent to Expand Section 7 Protections
...origin” and to investigate reports of such harassment and to take prompt and effective remedial action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(d). Local laws in many states and cities have even stricter requirements regarding preventing and addressing workplace harassment. Employer......
-
NLRB General Counsel Reveals Intent to Expand Section 7 Protections
...origin” and to investigate reports of such harassment and to take prompt and effective remedial action. See 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(d). Local laws in many states and cities have even stricter requirements regarding preventing and addressing workplace harassment. Employer......
-
February 2018: Defining Sexual Harassment: The State of the Law
...even by non-supervisors if they knew or should have known about the harassment but failed to take adequate steps to address it. See 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11(d). Most, if not all, states permit negligent hiring, retention, or supervision claims against employers who have reason to believe one of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
12 books & journal articles
-
Racial Extremism in the Army
..."may produce a violation of Title VII's general prohibition against sexual discrimination in employment practices, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2; 29 C.F.R. §1604.11 (1991)." R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377, 389 (1992). In the example above, a Title VII argument has little force because the co......
-
Reasonableness for Free: Why Buy Employment Practices Liability Insurance when Eeoc.Gov Gives Protection Away?
...742 (1998). [43] Id. at 747-48. [44] Id. at 749. [45] See generally Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 65 (1986) (referring to 29 C.F.R. 1604.11(a), the Court defined quid pro quo sexual harassment as sexual misconduct that is "directly linked to the grant or denial of an economic qu......
-
How Sexual Harassment Law Failed Its Feminist Roots
...not “offered any evidence raising a genuine issue of material fact that she 57. U.S. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm’n, Sexual Harassment, 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11 (2020). 58. U.S. Equal Emp. Opportunity Comm’n, Proposed Enforcement Guidance on Unlawful Harassment, EEOC-2016-0009-001 (proposed on Ja......
-
It Wasn't That Bad': The Necessity of Social Framework Evidence in Use of the Reasonable Woman Standard
...Because of Sex Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 45 Fed. Reg. 74,676, 74,677 (Nov. 10, 1980) (codified at 29 C.F.R. § 1604.11). 26. Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57, 73 (1986). 27. GILLIAN THOMAS, BECAUSE OF SEX: ONE LAW, TEN CASES, AND FIFTY YEARS THAT CHANGED AMERIC......
Request a trial to view additional results