37 CFR 41.205 - Settlement agreements
| Cite as | 37 CFR 41.205 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
150 practice notes
-
Apple, Inc. v. X One, Inc., Patent Interference 106
...if there is any settlement agreement or related documents which have not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. §135(c) and 37 C.F.R. §41.205; FURTHER ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve notice on the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (3......
-
EcoServices LLC v. Lufthansa Technik Ag, Patent Interference 106
...7, 445, 677 and Lufthansa application 12/769, 514; It is further ORDERED that the parties are directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and to 37 C.F.R. § 41.205 regarding the filing of settlement agreements; and It is further ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve notice on the Dir......
-
Nova Ortho-Med Inc. v. Kratos Enterprises, LLC, Patent Interference 105
...is any settlement agreement or related documents which have not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) (2011) and 37 C.F.R. § 41.205; and FURTHER ORDERED that if a party seeks judicial review, the party must file a notice with the Board (37 C.F.R. § 41.8(b)) within seven da......
-
Melrose v. Graham Packaging Co., Patent Interference 106
...before the termination of the interference as between the said parties to the agreement or understanding." 35 U.S.C. § 135(c); see also 37 C.F.R. § 41.205 (settlement agreements). Judicial review under 35 U.S.C. § 146 (2010) is no longer available. Biogen MA, Inc., v. Japanese Foundation fo......
Request a trial to view additional results
150 cases
-
Apple, Inc. v. X One, Inc., Patent Interference 106
...if there is any settlement agreement or related documents which have not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. §135(c) and 37 C.F.R. §41.205; FURTHER ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve notice on the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (3......
-
EcoServices LLC v. Lufthansa Technik Ag, Patent Interference 106
...7, 445, 677 and Lufthansa application 12/769, 514; It is further ORDERED that the parties are directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and to 37 C.F.R. § 41.205 regarding the filing of settlement agreements; and It is further ORDERED that a party seeking judicial review timely serve notice on the Dir......
-
Nova Ortho-Med Inc. v. Kratos Enterprises, LLC, Patent Interference 105
...is any settlement agreement or related documents which have not been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) (2011) and 37 C.F.R. § 41.205; and FURTHER ORDERED that if a party seeks judicial review, the party must file a notice with the Board (37 C.F.R. § 41.8(b)) within seven da......
-
Melrose v. Graham Packaging Co., Patent Interference 106
...before the termination of the interference as between the said parties to the agreement or understanding." 35 U.S.C. § 135(c); see also 37 C.F.R. § 41.205 (settlement agreements). Judicial review under 35 U.S.C. § 146 (2010) is no longer available. Biogen MA, Inc., v. Japanese Foundation fo......
Request a trial to view additional results