40 C.F.R. §52.31 - Selection of sequence of mandatory sanctions for findings made pursuant to section 179 of the Clean Air Act
Cite as | 40 C.F.R. §52.31 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
State of Mo. v. US, 4:94CV01288.
...6, 1994, providing that mandatory sanctions under CAA § 179 apply only to the "affected area." 59 Fed.Reg. 39832, to be codified at 40 C.F.R. § 52.31(b)(3). EPA also promulgated another rule, which took effect September 6, 1994, that provides that when mandatory sanctions are imposed under ......
-
Sierra Club v. United States Envtl. Prot. Agency
...application of sanctions and 2–year clock for a Federal implementation plan (FIP) under the [CAA].” Id.; see also 42 U.S.C. § 7509; 40 C.F.R. § 52.31. The State effectively gained an 18–month extension in which it was required to revise the SIP before EPA would impose sanctions. 67 Fed.Reg.......
-
Miss. Comm'n On Envtl. Quality v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
...can only prohibit funding for transportation projects or grants applicable to the nonattainment area. 42 U.S.C. § 7509(b)(1)(A) ; 40 C.F.R. § 52.31(b)(3), (e)(2) (providing that the “highway funding sanction shall apply ... only to ... areas that are designated nonattainment”); see 790 F.3d......
-
St. of Michigan v. U.S. Envt'l Protection Agency, s. 98-1497
...controlling VOC emissions even though VOCs as well as NOx emissions contribute to ozone problems. See, e.g., id. at 57,359; see also 40 C.F.R. § 52.31(b)(7) (1998) (defining ozone Yet, the budget plan's defining aspects do not necessarily cause the program to conflict with the limiting prin......
Request a trial to view additional results