20 CFR 725.606 - Security for the payment of benefits
| Cite as | 20 CFR 725.606 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Arch Coal, Inc. v. Hugler, Civil Action No. 16–669 (JDB)
...posting a surety bond or other security—to guarantee that the mine operator can pay future liability. See id. ; 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.606(a), 726.109, 726.115. When there is no operator able to pay the claim, or if the Responsible Operator fails to pay, the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund provi......
-
Hunt v. Jonida Trucking, Inc., BRB 95-0833 BLA
...reconsideration, the administrative law judge considered the Director's request that employer be required to post a bond pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§725.606 and 725.494 and ordered employer to secure the payment of $150, 000 as authorized by Section 725.606. Decision on Reconsideration dated No......
-
Harry J. Benson and Son, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor, No. 93-1491
...to this section in any case where an operator or other liable employer is uninsured or has failed to secure the payment of benefits." 20 C.F.R. Sec. 725.606 In his initial decision, the ALJ found that "[u]nder Sec. 725.606 this Office must require an uninsured employer who is found liable t......
3 cases
-
Arch Coal, Inc. v. Hugler, Civil Action No. 16–669 (JDB)
...posting a surety bond or other security—to guarantee that the mine operator can pay future liability. See id. ; 20 C.F.R. §§ 725.606(a), 726.109, 726.115. When there is no operator able to pay the claim, or if the Responsible Operator fails to pay, the Black Lung Disability Trust Fund provi......
-
Hunt v. Jonida Trucking, Inc., BRB 95-0833 BLA
...reconsideration, the administrative law judge considered the Director's request that employer be required to post a bond pursuant to 20 C.F.R. §§725.606 and 725.494 and ordered employer to secure the payment of $150, 000 as authorized by Section 725.606. Decision on Reconsideration dated No......
-
Harry J. Benson and Son, Inc. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Dept. of Labor, No. 93-1491
...section in any case where an operator or other liable employer is uninsured or has failed to secure the payment of benefits." 20 C.F.R. Sec. 725.606 In his initial decision, the ALJ found that "[u]nder Sec. 725.606 this Office must require an uninsured employer who is found liable......