29 CFR 1926.650 - Scope, application, and definitions applicable to this subpart

Cite as29 CFR 1926.650
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • Woodson v. Rowland, No. 584A88
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • August 14, 1991
    ...thereunder required such safety precautions for the trenches in question. N.C.G.S. § 95-136(g); 13 N.C.Admin.Code 7E.1400 et seq; cf. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.650-.653. Because of the soil conditions and geography, Craig believed that a trench box was the best means of ensuring his workers' safety.......
  • Downs v. Steel and Craft Builders, Inc., No. 2-04-0996.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Illinois
    • June 22, 2005
    ...from hazardous conditions, such as water accumulation, and the inspection of excavation sites for potential safety hazards. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.650 through 1926.651 (2004). It is difficult, if not impossible, for an employer to avoid government sanctions for noncompliance with these stand......
  • Sabine Consol., Inc. v. State, Nos. 1069-88
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • February 13, 1991
    ...prescribes safety standards, in effect, established local standards governing trenches when OSHA had already regulated that area. See 29 CFR §§ 1926.650-1926.652. The Court of Appeals reasoned that even if the State had not used the TOSA language, "criminal prosecution based on the violatio......
  • U.S. v. Shear, No. 91-1678
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • May 28, 1992
    ...precautions were taken to safeguard employees where evidence of possible cave-ins was apparent, in violation of section 666(e), 29 C.F.R. § 1926.650(i) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. In Count Two, ABC and Shear were charged with willfully failing to shore, sheet, brace, slope, or otherwise support the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
  • Woodson v. Rowland, No. 584A88
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • August 14, 1991
    ...thereunder required such safety precautions for the trenches in question. N.C.G.S. § 95-136(g); 13 N.C.Admin.Code 7E.1400 et seq; cf. 29 C.F.R. § 1926.650-.653. Because of the soil conditions and geography, Craig believed that a trench box was the best means of ensuring his workers' safety.......
  • Downs v. Steel and Craft Builders, Inc., No. 2-04-0996.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Illinois
    • June 22, 2005
    ...from hazardous conditions, such as water accumulation, and the inspection of excavation sites for potential safety hazards. See 29 C.F.R. §§ 1926.650 through 1926.651 (2004). It is difficult, if not impossible, for an employer to avoid government sanctions for noncompliance with these stand......
  • Sabine Consol., Inc. v. State, Nos. 1069-88
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
    • February 13, 1991
    ...prescribes safety standards, in effect, established local standards governing trenches when OSHA had already regulated that area. See 29 CFR §§ 1926.650-1926.652. The Court of Appeals reasoned that even if the State had not used the TOSA language, "criminal prosecution based on the violatio......
  • U.S. v. Shear, No. 91-1678
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • May 28, 1992
    ...precautions were taken to safeguard employees where evidence of possible cave-ins was apparent, in violation of section 666(e), 29 C.F.R. § 1926.650(i) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. In Count Two, ABC and Shear were charged with willfully failing to shore, sheet, brace, slope, or otherwise support the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT