20 CFR 655.0 - Scope and purpose of part

Cite as20 CFR 655.0
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 practice notes
  • Gaxiola v. Williams Seafood of Arapahoe Inc., No. 4:08–CV–134–H(3).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • March 1, 2011
    ...as well as by United States Department of Labor (“USDOL”) regulations applicable to the temporary labor certification process, 20 C.F.R. § 655.0 et seq. and 8 C.F.R. § 214.2. On December 19, 2008, USDOL published new regulations governing the H–2B program.2 See Labor Certification Process a......
  • Garcia v. Frog Island Seafood, Inc., No. 2:06-CV-46-F.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • June 29, 2009
    ...as well as United States Department of Labor ("DOL") regulations applicable to the temporary labor certification process. See generally 20 C.F.R. Part 655, Subpart 3. Hortencia Seefo ("Seefoo") recruited and supervised the H-2B workers. Aff. of Hortencia Seefoo ¶¶ 3, 8 ("Seefoo Aff.") [DE-3......
  • Comité De Apoyo Trabajadores Agricolas v. Perez, Civil Action No. 09–240.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • September 10, 2014
    ...and conditions for the particular job opportunities, below which similarly employed U.S. workers would be adversely affected ....” 20 C.F.R. § 655.0(2).2 In this action, Plaintiffs have not moved for class certification. Plaintiff Barrera was named as a representative of a class of H–2B wor......
  • Comité De Apoyo Trabajadores Agricolas v. Perez, Civil Action No. 09–240.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • September 11, 2014
    ...and conditions for the particular job opportunities, below which similarly employed U.S. workers would be adversely affected ....” 20 C.F.R. § 655.0(2). 2. In this action, Plaintiffs have not moved for class certification. Plaintiff Barrera was named as a representative of a class of H–2B w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
32 cases
  • Gaxiola v. Williams Seafood of Arapahoe Inc., No. 4:08–CV–134–H(3).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Eastern District of North Carolina
    • March 1, 2011
    ...as well as by United States Department of Labor (“USDOL”) regulations applicable to the temporary labor certification process, 20 C.F.R. § 655.0 et seq. and 8 C.F.R. § 214.2. On December 19, 2008, USDOL published new regulations governing the H–2B program.2 See Labor Certification Process a......
  • Comité De Apoyo Trabajadores Agricolas v. Perez, Civil Action No. 09–240.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • September 10, 2014
    ...and conditions for the particular job opportunities, below which similarly employed U.S. workers would be adversely affected ....” 20 C.F.R. § 655.0(2).2 In this action, Plaintiffs have not moved for class certification. Plaintiff Barrera was named as a representative of a class of H–2B wor......
  • Comité De Apoyo Trabajadores Agricolas v. Perez, Civil Action No. 09–240.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of Pennsylvania)
    • September 11, 2014
    ...and conditions for the particular job opportunities, below which similarly employed U.S. workers would be adversely affected ....” 20 C.F.R. § 655.0(2). 2. In this action, Plaintiffs have not moved for class certification. Plaintiff Barrera was named as a representative of a class of H–2B w......
  • De Leon-Granados v. Eller & Sons Trees, Inc., No. 1:05-CV-1473-CC.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. Northern District of Georgia
    • October 7, 2008
    ...workers already employed in the industry for which H-2B workers are sought could not be harmed by the employment of foreign workers. 20 C.F.R. § 655.0(a). The Department of Labor determined that an employer must provide "full-time" employment to its H-2B employees in order not to adversely ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT