50 C.F.R. §402.01 - Scope

Cite as50 C.F.R. §402.01
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
278 cases
  • CONSERVANCY of Sw. Fla. v. UNITED States FISH, Case No. 2:10-cv-106-FtM-SPC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 11th Circuit. United States District Court of Middle District of Florida
    • 6 de abril de 2011
    ...ESA with respect to species under thePage 3jurisdiction of the Secretary of the Interior, including designating critical habitat.2 50 C.F.R. § 402.01(b). The Court uses Service and Secretary interchangeably in its discussion below. The Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi or puma concolor ......
  • Conservation Cong. v. United States Forest Serv., NO. CIV. S-11-2605 LKK/EFB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • 19 de junho de 2012
    ...SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT--------Notes: 1. The FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service administer the ESA. 50 C.F.R. § 402.01(b). The "FWS has jurisdiction over freshwater and terrestrial species while the National Marine Fisheries Service is responsible for anadromous......
  • Coal. for a Sustainable Delta v. Fed. Emergency Mgmt. Agency, 1:09-cv-02024 OWW GSA
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. Eastern District of California
    • 19 de agosto de 2011
    ...delta smelt) and administers the ESA through the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS"). See id. § 1532(15); 50 C.F.R. §§ 17.11, 402.01(b). ESA Section 9 prohibits "any person subject to the jurisdiction of the United States" from "tak[ing] any such species within the United States......
  • Nat'l Parks Conservation Ass'n v. Jewell, Civil Action No. 09–00115 BJR
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 20 de fevereiro de 2014
    ...The NMFS (with respect to marine species) and the Service (for other species) share responsibility for administering the ESA. See 50 C.F.R. § 402.01(b) ; Interagency Cooperation—Endangered Species Act of 1973, 51 Fed.Reg. 19926, 19926 (June 3, 1986).5 Informal consultation is “an optional p......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • Endangered Species at Sea: Applying the ESA to Maritime Jurisdictions
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 51-6, June 2021
    • 1 de junho de 2021
    ...Challenge of Regulating Small Harms , 61 Fla. L. Rev. 142, 165 (2012). 86. 16 U.S.C. §1536(a). 87. Owen, supra note 85, at 165. 88. 50 C.F.R. §402.01(a) (2020): Section 7(a)(2) of the Act requires every Federal agency, in consultation with and with the assistance of the Secretary, to insure......
  • Humane Society v. Jewell: The Court Cries Wolf
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 46-1, January 2016
    • 1 de janeiro de 2016
    ...at one time occupied most of the continental United States. 1. 16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544, ELR Stat. ESA §§2-18. See 16 U.S.C. §1532(15); 50 C.F.R. §402.01(a), (b). 2. 76 Fed. Reg. 53379 (Aug. 26, 2011). In 1996, FWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) adopted a joint policy for pur......
  • Appendix B. Regulations and Policies
    • United States
    • Endangered species deskbook
    • 22 de abril de 2010
    ...of Commerce, or his or her delegate, depending upon which Secretary has responsibility for the affected species as determined pursuant to 50 CFR 402.01. Service means the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or the National Marine Fisheries Service, as appropriate. To the extent that suc......
  • The Outer Limits of Endangered Species Act Liability-The ESA's Indirect Effect Regulation and Its Application to Climate Change
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 41-3, March 2011
    • 1 de março de 2011
    ...review of cumulative efects. Otherwise, in a particular situation, the jeopardy prohibition could operate to block “nonjeopardy” 4. 50 C.F.R. §§402.01 et seq. 5. 50 C.F.R. §402.02 (emphasis added). 6. Id . 7. 51 Fed. Reg. 19926 (June 3, 1986) [hereinafter Preamble]. 8. See 40 C.F.R. §1508.8......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT