5 CFR 731.301 - Scope

Cite as5 CFR 731.301
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 practice notes
  • Larry v. Lawler, No. 76-1747
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • August 18, 1978
    ...eligible applicants for employment consideration by the various agencies and departments within the federal government. As required by 5 C.F.R. § 731.301, the Commission conducted a standard background investigation to determine the applicant's "qualifications and suitability for employment......
  • American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, AFL-CIO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 15, 1997
    ...is suitable for employment or, in the case of incumbent employees, is suitable for continued employment, in a public trust position. 5 C.F.R. §§ 731.301, 731.302. Failure to provide the requested information may result in removal from federal employment. A challenge to the SF 85P was brough......
  • Devine v. Sutermeister, No. 83-813
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • December 14, 1983
    ...reflect the "fact" that an appointment obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the agency, as 5 C.F.R. Sec. 731.301(a) (1982) renders every appointment "subject to investigation by OPM" concerning the "qualifications and suitability" of an appointee; (5) pub......
  • Barry v. Office of Personnel Management, No. 92-3032
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • April 15, 1992
    ...because he sought a transfer to the position at El Toro, California, and that this is an action excluded from OPM review under 5 C.F.R. § 731.301(a)(1)(i), (vi). The trouble with this view is that the President's directive of December 9, 1981, effectively vested OPM with authority to determ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
6 cases
  • Larry v. Lawler, No. 76-1747
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)
    • August 18, 1978
    ...eligible applicants for employment consideration by the various agencies and departments within the federal government. As required by 5 C.F.R. § 731.301, the Commission conducted a standard background investigation to determine the applicant's "qualifications and suitability for employment......
  • American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO v. Department of Housing & Urban Development, AFL-CIO
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 15, 1997
    ...is suitable for employment or, in the case of incumbent employees, is suitable for continued employment, in a public trust position. 5 C.F.R. §§ 731.301, 731.302. Failure to provide the requested information may result in removal from federal employment. A challenge to the SF 85P was brough......
  • Devine v. Sutermeister, No. 83-813
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • December 14, 1983
    ...reflect the "fact" that an appointment obtained through fraud or misrepresentation is voidable at the option of the agency, as 5 C.F.R. Sec. 731.301(a) (1982) renders every appointment "subject to investigation by OPM" concerning the "qualifications and suitability" of an appointee; (5) pub......
  • Barry v. Office of Personnel Management, No. 92-3032
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • April 15, 1992
    ...because he sought a transfer to the position at El Toro, California, and that this is an action excluded from OPM review under 5 C.F.R. § 731.301(a)(1)(i), (vi). The trouble with this view is that the President's directive of December 9, 1981, effectively vested OPM with authority to determ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT