21 C.F.R. §1308.13 - Schedule III
| Cite as | 21 C.F.R. §1308.13 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
44 cases
-
United States v. Akinyoyenu, Criminal Action No. 15-42 (JEB)
...811(a)(2); see id.§ 812(c) n.1. In this case, however, Akinyoyenu does not claim that she has done so for butalbital or Fioricet. See 21 C.F.R. § 1308.13(c)(3) (still listing "[a]ny substance which contains any quantity of a derivative of barbituric acid").Section 811(g) also provides other......
-
United States v. Freeman, 19-4104
...Combination Products from Schedule III to Schedule II, 79 Fed. Reg. 49,661, 49,665 –66, 49,675 (Aug. 22, 2014) (codified at 21 C.F.R. § 1308.13(e)(1) ). Like other kinds of opioids, hydrocodone requires users to take progressively more pills in order to feel its effects and avoid painful wi......
-
Wadlington v. Werlich, Case No. 17-cv-449-SMY
...to federal Schedule IV in 1973). Nor does not fall under the definitions of "marihuana" (21 U.S.C. § 802(16)(A)), "anabolic steroid" (21 C.F.R. § 1308.13(f), which lists anabolic steroids in federal Schedule III), or a "depressant or stimulant substance" (21 C.F.R.Page 17 §§ 1308.11(e) and ......
-
John Doe, Inc. v. Drug Enforcement Admin., 06-1270.
...in sesame oil and encapsulated in a soft gelatin capsule in a U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved product" to schedule III. 21 C.F.R. § 1308.13(g)(1) (emphasis added); 64 Fed. Reg. 35,928 (1999). DEA was careful to stress, however, that it was rescheduling dronabinol only "in a FDA a......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
In the First Case of its Kind, Court Rules Federal Law Does Not Trump Employee Protections under State Medical Marijuana Law
...signal a new trend expanding the protections that must be afforded to employees who use medical marijuana under state law. Footnotes 1 21 C.F.R. § 1308.13 2 United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers Co-Op, 532 U.S. 483 (2001) (growers can be prosecuted); Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) ......
-
In The First Case Of Its Kind, Court Rules Federal Law Does Not Trump Employee Protections Under State Medical Marijuana Law
...signal a new trend expanding the protections that must be afforded to employees who use medical marijuana under state law. Footnotes 1 21 C.F.R. § 1308.13 2 United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers Co-Op, 532 U.S. 483 (2001) (growers can be prosecuted); Gonzales v. Raich, 545 U.S. 1 (2005) ......
-
DEA Issues Final Rule Up-Scheduling Hydrocodone Combination Products from Schedule III to Schedule II
...intended to be and should not be relied upon as legal advice. In some jurisdictions, this may be considered “Attorney Advertising.” 1 21 C.F.R. § 1308.13(e)(1). 2 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, Schedules of Controlled Substances: Rescheduling of Hydrocodone Combination Products From Schedul......
-
Legal issues in use of HCG for weight loss
...any other substance now or hereafter classified as a Schedule III controlled substance under and pursuant to Federal DEA regulations, 21 CFR §1308.13, and which is indicated for use in the treatment of exogenous obesity by express approval of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Sch......