29 CFR 1926.105 - Safety nets

Cite as29 CFR 1926.105
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
55 practice notes
  • Donovan v. A.A. Beiro Const. Co., Inc., Nos. 83-2008
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 26 Octubre 1984
    ...(D.C.1982). The question in L.R. Willson was at what point the use of safety belts became "impractical" within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.105(a). The Secretary argued that the inability to use safety belts at all times rendered them impractical thus making the use of safety nets man......
  • S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Com'n, Nos. 79-2358
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 26 Octubre 1981
    ...Cir. 1976) (general duty clause); Brennan v. OSHRC, 513 F.2d 713 (8th Cir. 1975) (affirming Commission order vacating citation under 29 C.F.R. § 1926.105(a), which requires safety nets where use of other fall protection devices is "impractical"); Brennan v. OSHRC, 488 F.2d 337 (5th Cir. 197......
  • Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 13 Diciembre 1994
    ...applicable to this job, because it was a matter of law for the court to instruct the jury on. Poznak was allowed to testify that 29 C.F.R. § 1926.105 was one of several safety regulations generally accepted within the construction industry as governing the use of safety nets. However, he wa......
  • Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Com'n, No. 77-2485
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 25 Junio 1979
    ...shall be provided with safety belts in accordance with § 1926.104 when they are working on float scaffolds. In addition Bristol cites 29 C.F.R. 1926.105(a) which Safety nets shall be provided when workplaces are more than 25 feet above the ground or water surface, or other surfaces where th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
52 cases
  • Donovan v. A.A. Beiro Const. Co., Inc., Nos. 83-2008
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 26 Octubre 1984
    ...(D.C.1982). The question in L.R. Willson was at what point the use of safety belts became "impractical" within the meaning of 29 C.F.R. Sec. 1926.105(a). The Secretary argued that the inability to use safety belts at all times rendered them impractical thus making the use of safety nets man......
  • S & H Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Occupational Safety & Health Review Com'n, Nos. 79-2358
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)
    • 26 Octubre 1981
    ...Cir. 1976) (general duty clause); Brennan v. OSHRC, 513 F.2d 713 (8th Cir. 1975) (affirming Commission order vacating citation under 29 C.F.R. § 1926.105(a), which requires safety nets where use of other fall protection devices is "impractical"); Brennan v. OSHRC, 488 F.2d 337 (5th Cir. 197......
  • Kane v. Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc.
    • United States
    • New Jersey Superior Court – Appellate Division
    • 13 Diciembre 1994
    ...applicable to this job, because it was a matter of law for the court to instruct the jury on. Poznak was allowed to testify that 29 C.F.R. § 1926.105 was one of several safety regulations generally accepted within the construction industry as governing the use of safety nets. However, he wa......
  • Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Inc. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Com'n, No. 77-2485
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 25 Junio 1979
    ...shall be provided with safety belts in accordance with § 1926.104 when they are working on float scaffolds. In addition Bristol cites 29 C.F.R. 1926.105(a) which Safety nets shall be provided when workplaces are more than 25 feet above the ground or water surface, or other surfaces where th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Request for Information on Communication Towers
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 20 Abril 2015
    ...coverage for every activity involved. Fall protection is covered in part by OSHA’s standards for fall protection in construction (29 C.F.R 1926, Subpart M). However, this does not cover construction of new communication towers which falls under 29 C.F.R § 1926.105. Additionally, communicati......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT