12 CFR 202.7 - Rules concerning extensions of credit

Cite as12 CFR 202.7
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
143 practice notes
  • U.S. v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., No. 85-2810
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • May 5, 1987
    ...the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ("ECOA"), 15 U.S.C. Secs. 1691-1691e, and Federal Reserve Board Regulation B ("Regulation B"), 12 C.F.R. Sec. 202.7 (1985), 1 the government sought an injunction under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1691e(h) and $10,000 in civil penalties under 15 U.S.C. Secs. 45(m)(1)(A), ......
  • RL BB Acquisition, LLC v. Bridgemill Commons Dev. Grp., LLC, No. 13–6034.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • June 12, 2014
    ...since it violated ECOA and Regulation B—specifically, Regulation B's prohibition on requiring spouses to guarantee loans. See12 C.F.R. § 202.7(d), 12 C.F.R. § 1002.7(d). Starr later moved for summary judgment on this ground, while Plaintiff filed its own motion for summary judgment on the m......
  • Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA, No. 17-11736
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • August 28, 2019
    ...creditors from treating married people differently by requiring spouses to assume liability for each other’s debt obligations. 12 C.F.R. 202.7(d) ; Equal Credit Opportunity Final Rulemaking, 40 Fed. Reg. 49,308 –09 (Oct. 22, 1975). Therefore, ever since 1977, Regulation B has prohibited cre......
  • Arnold v. Palmer, No. 34738.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • October 29, 2009
    ...credit secured by their jointly held property. Advantage argues that such practice is explicitly barred by federal banking regulation 12 C.F.R § 202.7 (2003), which specifically addresses the requirement of signatures of spouses on credit instruments. The federal regulation is also the crux......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
139 cases
  • RL BB Acquisition, LLC v. Bridgemill Commons Dev. Grp., LLC, No. 13–6034.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • June 12, 2014
    ...since it violated ECOA and Regulation B—specifically, Regulation B's prohibition on requiring spouses to guarantee loans. See12 C.F.R. § 202.7(d), 12 C.F.R. § 1002.7(d). Starr later moved for summary judgment on this ground, while Plaintiff filed its own motion for summary judgment on the m......
  • U.S. v. ITT Consumer Financial Corp., No. 85-2810
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • May 5, 1987
    ...the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ("ECOA"), 15 U.S.C. Secs. 1691-1691e, and Federal Reserve Board Regulation B ("Regulation B"), 12 C.F.R. Sec. 202.7 (1985), 1 the government sought an injunction under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1691e(h) and $10,000 in civil penalties under 15 U.S.C. Secs. 45(m)(1)(A), ......
  • Regions Bank v. Legal Outsource PA, No. 17-11736
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • August 28, 2019
    ...creditors from treating married people differently by requiring spouses to assume liability for each other’s debt obligations. 12 C.F.R. 202.7(d) ; Equal Credit Opportunity Final Rulemaking, 40 Fed. Reg. 49,308 –09 (Oct. 22, 1975). Therefore, ever since 1977, Regulation B has prohibited cre......
  • Arnold v. Palmer, No. 34738.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • October 29, 2009
    ...credit secured by their jointly held property. Advantage argues that such practice is explicitly barred by federal banking regulation 12 C.F.R § 202.7 (2003), which specifically addresses the requirement of signatures of spouses on credit instruments. The federal regulation is also the crux......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Until Debt Do Us Part: Eighth Circuit Creates Split On Violation Of ECOA For Spousal Guaranties
    • United States
    • Mondaq United States
    • February 24, 2015
    ..."The applicant's spouse may serve as an additional party, but the creditor shall not require that the spouse be the additional party." 12 C.F.R. § 202.7(d)(5). In Hawkins, the two wives signed a guaranty of the $2 million obligation of their husbands' company, PHL Development LLC,, a compan......
  • The Equal Credit Opportunity Act – a Sword and a Shield?
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • October 10, 2014
    ...§1602 [2] Bank of America, N.A. v. GREC Homes IX, LLC, 2014 WL 351962, *14 (S.D. Fla. Jan. 23, 2014)(internal citations omitted). [3] 12 C.F.R. § 202.7(d). [4] 13 WL 2455972 (M.D. Fla. June 6, [5] RL REGI North Carolina, LLC v. Lighthouse Cove, LLC, 748 S.E.2d 723 (N.C. Ct. App. 2013). [6]...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT