38 CFR 20.201 - Rule 201. Notice of Disagreement
| Cite as | 38 CFR 20.201 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
72 practice notes
-
Standard Claims and Appeals Forms
...the Notice of Appeal Rights sent with the notice of a decision on a claim. In these cases, this rule replaces the current provision in 38 CFR 20.201 which permitted an appellant to begin the appeal process by filing in any format a statement that can be ``reasonably construed'' as seeking a......
-
Net Worth, Asset Transfers, and Income Exclusions for Needs-Based Benefits
...from the primary mission of paying pension benefits to those in need. Claimants always have the right to appeal any VA decision. See 38 CFR 20.201. Section 3.277--Eligibility Reporting VA has discretionary authority, under 38 U.S.C. 1506, to require pension beneficiaries to complete annual ......
-
VA Compensation and Pension Regulation Rewrite Project
...relieves the beneficiary of the burden of preparing and filing a written Notice of Disagreement (including the elements required under 38 CFR 20.201, ``Notice of Disagreement''). The process under Sec. 3.103(b)(4) does not replace the appeal process described in 38 U.S.C. 7105. Rather, it p......
-
Smith v. Brown, No. 93-7043
...as any writing "expressing dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative determination of an agency of original jurisdiction." 38 C.F.R. Sec. 20.201 (emphasis The filing of a NOD triggers a reexamination of the claim at the AOJ. 38 U.S.C. Sec. 7105(d)(1) (Supp. IV 1992). If disagreem......
Request a trial to view additional results
59 cases
-
Disabled American Veterans v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs, 02-7304, -7305, -7316.
...The NOD is a written communication from the veteran expressing dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative decision of the VA. 38 C.F.R. § 20.201; see Collaro v. West, 136 F.3d 1304, 1308 (Fed. Cir. 1998). After a claimant files a NOD, the AOJ must prepare a Statement of the Case (......
-
Disabled American v. Sec. of Veterans Affairs, No. 02-7304.
...The NOD is a written communication from the veteran expressing dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative decision of the VA. 38 C.F.R. § 20.201; see Collaro v. West, 136 F.3d 1304, 1308 (Fed.Cir.1998). After a claimant files a NOD, the AOJ must prepare a Statement of the Case ("S......
-
Jaquay v. Principi, No. 98-7051.
...things, appeal the decision to the BVA. To appeal a VARO decision, the veteran is required to file a Notice of Disagreement ("NOD"). 38 C.F.R. § 20.201 (2001). Rather than sending the NOD to the BVA in Washington, D.C., the veteran must send it to the VARO from which the veteran received th......
-
Cook v. Principi, No. 00-7171.
...NOD is a written communication from the veteran expressing dissatisfaction or disagreement with an adjudicative decision of the VA. See 38 C.F.R. § 20.201; Collaro v. West, 136 F.3d 1304, 1308 (Fed.Cir.1998) (explaining that disagreement between the VA and the veteran over legal entitlement......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Economics and Austerity Relative to Veterans' Claims and the Veterans Appeal Process
...presumptive service connection). 122 Id. § 4.1. 123 38 U.S.C. § 5101 (Westlaw 2012); id. § 5102; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1(p) (Westlaw 2012); 38 C.F.R. § 20.201 (Westlaw 2012). 124 See Riley, supra note 58, at 455. 125 This is also referred to as the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ). 126 See 38 ......
-
GSB Vol. 7, No. 4 - #2. DEFENDING AMERICA'S DEFENDERS: Advocating on Behalf of Georgia's Military Veterans.
...of record and applicable provisions of law and regulation." 38 U.S.C. 5107(b) (1994). Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 49, 54 (1990). 38 C.F.R. 20.201 38 U.S.C. 7105(d) (1994); 38 C.F.R. 19.29 (2001). 38 C.F.R. 20.302(b) (2001). 38 U.S.C. 7104(a) (1994). See also Litke v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. ......