36 C.F.R. 219.3 - Role of science in planning

Cite as36 C.F.R. 219.3
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
58 practice notes
  • Native Ecosystems Council v. Erickson, CV 17-53-M-DWM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • August 1, 2018
    ...best available scientific information to inform the planning process ... for ... developing, amending, or revising a plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. As Defendants point out, the Collaborative Recommendations includes significant review of research on elk security and how it applies in wester......
  • Curry v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ.A. 97-1081.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • October 15, 1997
    ...forest products.... Cutting methods that develop and maintain uneven-aged stands are single-tree selection and group selection. * * * 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. The logging operations authorized by the Mortality II Project would result in an estimated harvest of 20.7 million board feet of sawtimber......
  • Sierra Club v. Glickman, No. 9:85-CV-69.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • August 14, 1997
    ...abundance of different plant and animal communities and species within the area covered by a land and resource management plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. But the regulations do not dictate that the Forest Service analyze diversity in any specific way, and courts defer to the Forest Service's......
  • Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander, No. 01-35184.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • September 5, 2002
    ...individuals to insure [that] its continued existence is well distributed in the planning area." Id. (emphasis added); see also 36 C.F.R § 219.3 (defining "planning area" as the area covered by a forest plan, in this case, the entire Payette). Plaintiffs argue that the Forest ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
55 cases
  • Native Ecosystems Council v. Erickson, CV 17-53-M-DWM
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 9th Circuit. United States District Court (Montana)
    • August 1, 2018
    ...use of "the best available scientific information to inform the planning process ... for ... developing, amending, or revising a plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. As Defendants point out, the Collaborative Recommendations includes significant review of research on elk security and how it applies in......
  • Curry v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ.A. 97-1081.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. United States District Courts. 3th Circuit. Western District of Pennsylvania
    • October 15, 1997
    ...forest products.... Cutting methods that develop and maintain uneven-aged stands are single-tree selection and group selection. * * * 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. The logging operations authorized by the Mortality II Project would result in an estimated harvest of 20.7 million board feet of sawtimber......
  • Sierra Club v. Glickman, No. 9:85-CV-69.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. United States District Court of Eastern District Texas
    • August 14, 1997
    ...and abundance of different plant and animal communities and species within the area covered by a land and resource management plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. But the regulations do not dictate that the Forest Service analyze diversity in any specific way, and courts defer to the Forest Service's ......
  • Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander, No. 01-35184.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • September 5, 2002
    ...individuals to insure [that] its continued existence is well distributed in the planning area." Id. (emphasis added); see also 36 C.F.R § 219.3 (defining "planning area" as the area covered by a forest plan, in this case, the entire Payette). Plaintiffs argue that the Forest Service has fai......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT