36 C.F.R. 219.3 - Role of science in planning
| Cite as | 36 C.F.R. 219.3 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
58 practice notes
-
Native Ecosystems Council v. Erickson, CV 17-53-M-DWM
...best available scientific information to inform the planning process ... for ... developing, amending, or revising a plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. As Defendants point out, the Collaborative Recommendations includes significant review of research on elk security and how it applies in wester......
-
Curry v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ.A. 97-1081.
...forest products.... Cutting methods that develop and maintain uneven-aged stands are single-tree selection and group selection. * * * 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. The logging operations authorized by the Mortality II Project would result in an estimated harvest of 20.7 million board feet of sawtimber......
-
Sierra Club v. Glickman, No. 9:85-CV-69.
...abundance of different plant and animal communities and species within the area covered by a land and resource management plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. But the regulations do not dictate that the Forest Service analyze diversity in any specific way, and courts defer to the Forest Service's......
-
Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander, No. 01-35184.
...individuals to insure [that] its continued existence is well distributed in the planning area." Id. (emphasis added); see also 36 C.F.R § 219.3 (defining "planning area" as the area covered by a forest plan, in this case, the entire Payette). Plaintiffs argue that the Forest ......
Request a trial to view additional results
55 cases
-
Native Ecosystems Council v. Erickson, CV 17-53-M-DWM
...use of "the best available scientific information to inform the planning process ... for ... developing, amending, or revising a plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. As Defendants point out, the Collaborative Recommendations includes significant review of research on elk security and how it applies in......
-
Curry v. U.S. Forest Service, No. Civ.A. 97-1081.
...forest products.... Cutting methods that develop and maintain uneven-aged stands are single-tree selection and group selection. * * * 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. The logging operations authorized by the Mortality II Project would result in an estimated harvest of 20.7 million board feet of sawtimber......
-
Sierra Club v. Glickman, No. 9:85-CV-69.
...and abundance of different plant and animal communities and species within the area covered by a land and resource management plan." 36 C.F.R. § 219.3. But the regulations do not dictate that the Forest Service analyze diversity in any specific way, and courts defer to the Forest Service's ......
-
Neighbors of Cuddy Mountain v. Alexander, No. 01-35184.
...individuals to insure [that] its continued existence is well distributed in the planning area." Id. (emphasis added); see also 36 C.F.R § 219.3 (defining "planning area" as the area covered by a forest plan, in this case, the entire Payette). Plaintiffs argue that the Forest Service has fai......
Request a trial to view additional results