5 C.F.R. §1201.12 - Revocation, amendment, or waiver of rules

Cite as5 C.F.R. §1201.12
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
96 cases
  • Bishop v. Tice, 79-1607
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • May 16, 1980
    ...days of the effective date of the action. This provision, however, may be waived "in an individual case for good cause shown * * *." 5 C.F.R. § 1201.12 (1979). The allegations set forth in Bishop's complaint concerning continual coercion up until at least the time of filing suit in the dist......
  • Wilder v. Prokop, 84-2540
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (10th Circuit)
    • May 10, 1988
    ...the prescribed time period. An appellant filing an untimely appeal in 1980 would be seeking a waiver of the MSPB rules. As stated in 5 C.F.R. Sec. 1201.12 (1980), in effect when Wilder Revocation, amendment or waiver of rules. The Board may revoke, amend or waive any of these regulations as......
  • Conforto v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 2012–3119.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • April 18, 2013
    ...But that is not true. The Board has the authority to entertain appeals that are procedurally defective under its own regulations, see5 C.F.R. § 1201.12, but it may not hear a case over which it lacks jurisdiction. 2. In light of the Supreme Court's consistent reference to “procedural” dismi......
  • Conforto v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., 2012-3119
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • April 18, 2013
    ...But that is not true. The Board has the authority to entertain appeals that are procedurally defective under its own regulations, see 5 C.F.R. § 1201.12, but it may not hear a case over which it lacks jurisdiction. 2. In light of the Supreme Court's consistent reference to "procedural" dism......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT