38 C.F.R. § 3.2500 - Review of decisions

Cite as38 C.F.R. § 3.2500
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 practice notes
  • Military-Veterans Advocacy v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, 2019-1685
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • July 30, 2021
    ...Specifically, 38 C.F.R. § 14.636(c)(1)(i) limits when a veteran's representative may charge fees for work on supplemental claims; 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500(b) bars the filing of a supplemental claim when adjudication of the same claim is pending before a federal court; and 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 exclud......
  • Military-Veterans Advocacy v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, 2019-1600, 2019-1680, 2019-1685, 2019-1687
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • July 30, 2021
    ...Specifically, 38 C.F.R. § 14.636(c)(1)(i) limits when a veteran's representative may charge fees for work on supplemental claims; 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500(b) bars the filing of a supplemental claim when adjudication of the same claim is pending before a federal court; and 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 exclud......
  • Kisor v. McDonough, 2016-1929
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 12, 2020
    ...benefits pursuant to a supplemental claim is the date the supplemental claim was filed. 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (2019) ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.400, 3.2500(h)(2) (2019).2 In this case, Mr. Kisor did not explicitly seek reconsideration, but the Board considered reconsideration under § 3.156(c) when it addr......
  • Kisor v. Wilkie, 2016-1929
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 12, 2020
    ...benefits pursuant to a supplemental claim is the date the supplemental claim was filed. 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (2019) ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.400, 3.2500(h)(2) (2019).2 In this case, Mr. Kisor did not explicitly seek reconsideration, but the Board considered reconsideration under § 3.156(c) when it addr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
24 cases
  • Military-Veterans Advocacy v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, 2019-1685
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • July 30, 2021
    ...Specifically, 38 C.F.R. § 14.636(c)(1)(i) limits when a veteran's representative may charge fees for work on supplemental claims; 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500(b) bars the filing of a supplemental claim when adjudication of the same claim is pending before a federal court; and 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 exclud......
  • Military-Veterans Advocacy v. Sec'y of Veterans Affairs, 2019-1600, 2019-1680, 2019-1685, 2019-1687
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • July 30, 2021
    ...Specifically, 38 C.F.R. § 14.636(c)(1)(i) limits when a veteran's representative may charge fees for work on supplemental claims; 38 C.F.R. § 3.2500(b) bars the filing of a supplemental claim when adjudication of the same claim is pending before a federal court; and 38 C.F.R. § 3.155 exclud......
  • Kisor v. McDonough, 2016-1929
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 12, 2020
    ...benefits pursuant to a supplemental claim is the date the supplemental claim was filed. 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (2019) ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.400, 3.2500(h)(2) (2019).2 In this case, Mr. Kisor did not explicitly seek reconsideration, but the Board considered reconsideration under § 3.156(c) when it addr......
  • Kisor v. Wilkie, 2016-1929
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
    • August 12, 2020
    ...benefits pursuant to a supplemental claim is the date the supplemental claim was filed. 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (2019) ; 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.400, 3.2500(h)(2) (2019).2 In this case, Mr. Kisor did not explicitly seek reconsideration, but the Board considered reconsideration under § 3.156(c) when it addr......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT