49 C.F.R. 173.28 - Reuse, reconditioning and remanufacture of packagings
Cite as | 49 C.F.R. 173.28 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 practice notes
-
Part II
...are different in the final rule than in the supplemental notice approach. In particular, the final regulations include an exception from 49 CFR 173.28(b)(2), which requires leakproofness testing every time a non-bulk packaging is refilled. The final regulations specify that this leakproofne......
-
Part III
...materials that have previously contained explosives provided that such re-use is performed in accordance with DOT regulations at 49 CFR 173.28 (Sec. The Petition On July 29, 2002, OSHA received a petition (the Petition) from the Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME) and the Sporting Arms ......
-
Pesticide programs:
Pesticide container and containment standards,
...are different in the final rule than in the supplemental notice approach. In particular, the final regulations include an exception from 49 CFR 173.28(b)(2), which requires leakproofness testing every time a non-bulk packaging is refilled. The final regulations specify that this leakproofne......
-
Separate Parts In This Issue
Part III
Labor Department, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
...materials that have previously contained explosives provided that such re-use is performed in accordance with DOT regulations at 49 CFR 173.28 (Sec. The Petition On July 29, 2002, OSHA received a petition (the Petition) from the Institute of Makers of Explosives (IME) and the Sporting Arms ......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 cases
-
Tekavec v. Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., No. 5:97 CV 0571.
...655 N.E.2d 440. 2. Violation of Statutory Duties Tekavec also alleges that Van Waters & Rogers violated statutory duties imposed by 49 C.F.R. § 173.28 and 49 C.F.R. § 173.503 pertaining to the required thickness of the drum walls. However, for the reasons that follow the Court holds tha......