29 C.F.R. §1630.12 - Retaliation and coercion

Cite as29 C.F.R. §1630.12
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
20 cases
  • Williams v. Eastside Lumberyard and Supply Co., No. 99-CV-4237-JPG.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. Southern District of Illinois
    • March 23, 2001
    ...in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing to enforce any provision of Title I or its implementing regulations (29 C.F.R. Part 1630). See 42 U.S.C. § 12203(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.12(a). A prima facie case of retaliation under the ADA requires the plaintiff to show that: (1) he ......
  • Hendler v. Intelecom Usa, Inc., 95-CV-2490 (JS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • April 15, 1997
    ...threaten, harass or interfere with any individual in the exercise or enjoyment of ... any right granted or protected in this part." 29 C.F.R. § 1630.12. This Court agrees with the sound reasoning in Haysman and finds that hostile work environment claims are cognizable under the Courts such ......
  • Butler v. Louisiana, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 12-00420-BAJ-RLB
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 5th Circuit. Middle District of Louisiana
    • December 3, 2014
    ...of "standards, criteria, or methods of administration which are not job-related and consistent with business necessity" are unlawful); 29 C.F.R. § 1630.12 (retaliation, coercion, interference or intimidation are unlawful). See also Interpretive Guidance to 29 C.F.R. § 1630.5 ("[I]t would be......
  • Johnson v. City of Mason, No. C-1-98-756.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. United States District Courts. 6th Circuit. Southern District of Ohio
    • April 4, 2000
    ...his "termination" was in retaliation against him for filing a discrimination complaint with the OCRC. Such a discharge would violate 29 C.F.R. § 1630.12(a) (West 1999) and the Ohio Rev.Code § 4112.02 (West 1999), which prohibit discrimination: "against any individual because that individual......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT